Objective To test the hypothesis that intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) is associated with decreased thymus size in the human fetus. Methods The thymus perimeter was measured in 60 consecutive IUGR fetuses at prenatal ultrasound examination. IUGR was defined as an abdominal circumference (AC) <5th centile. Sixty controls were identified by selection of the next consecutive appropriately grown fetus of similar gestational age (±1 week). To exclude fetal size effects, ratios between thymus perimeter and fetal biometry measurements including biparietal diameter (BPD), AC and femur length (FL), as well as estimated fetal weight (EFW) were compared between IUGR fetuses and controls. Results The proportion of fetuses with thymus perimeter <5th centile for gestation was significantly higher in IUGR fetuses than in controls (58/60 vs. 7/60, P < 0.0001). The mean thymus perimeter/BPD ratio (0.87 ± 0.20 vs. 1.13 ± 0.13, P < 0.0001), thymus perimeter/AC ratio (0.28 ± 0.06 vs. 0.35 ± 0.03, P < 0.0001), thymus perimeter/FL ratio (1.18 ± 0.26 vs. 1.51 ± 0.19, P < 0.001) and thymus perimeter/EFW ratio (0.05 ± 0.01 vs. 0.06 ± 0.01, P = 0.02) were significantly lower in IUGR fetuses than in controls. There was a significant positive correlation between the observed-to-expected mean for gestation thymus perimeter ratio and the enrolment-to-delivery interval (r = 0.44, P < 0.001). Conclusion IUGR is associated with a disproportionately small thymus. This supports the hypothesis that thymic involution may be part of the fetal neuroendocrine response to intrauterine starvation.

Ultrasonographic measurement of thymus size in IUGR fetuses: a marker of the fetal immunoendocrine response to malnutrition

CROMI, ANTONELLA;GHEZZI, FABIO;SIESTO, GABRIELE;BOLIS, PIER FRANCESCO
2009-01-01

Abstract

Objective To test the hypothesis that intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) is associated with decreased thymus size in the human fetus. Methods The thymus perimeter was measured in 60 consecutive IUGR fetuses at prenatal ultrasound examination. IUGR was defined as an abdominal circumference (AC) <5th centile. Sixty controls were identified by selection of the next consecutive appropriately grown fetus of similar gestational age (±1 week). To exclude fetal size effects, ratios between thymus perimeter and fetal biometry measurements including biparietal diameter (BPD), AC and femur length (FL), as well as estimated fetal weight (EFW) were compared between IUGR fetuses and controls. Results The proportion of fetuses with thymus perimeter <5th centile for gestation was significantly higher in IUGR fetuses than in controls (58/60 vs. 7/60, P < 0.0001). The mean thymus perimeter/BPD ratio (0.87 ± 0.20 vs. 1.13 ± 0.13, P < 0.0001), thymus perimeter/AC ratio (0.28 ± 0.06 vs. 0.35 ± 0.03, P < 0.0001), thymus perimeter/FL ratio (1.18 ± 0.26 vs. 1.51 ± 0.19, P < 0.001) and thymus perimeter/EFW ratio (0.05 ± 0.01 vs. 0.06 ± 0.01, P = 0.02) were significantly lower in IUGR fetuses than in controls. There was a significant positive correlation between the observed-to-expected mean for gestation thymus perimeter ratio and the enrolment-to-delivery interval (r = 0.44, P < 0.001). Conclusion IUGR is associated with a disproportionately small thymus. This supports the hypothesis that thymic involution may be part of the fetal neuroendocrine response to intrauterine starvation.
2009
fetal thymus; immune system; IUGR; organ size; ultrasound
Cromi, Antonella; Ghezzi, Fabio; Raffaelli, R.; Bergamini, V.; Siesto, Gabriele; Bolis, PIER FRANCESCO
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Fetal thymus ultrasound and IUGR.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: DRM non definito
Dimensione 200.15 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
200.15 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11383/1709029
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 76
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 68
social impact