OBJECTIVE To review our experience with the surgical treatment of frontoethmoidal osteomas, focusing on the osteomas that were either localized laterally in the frontal sinus or showing intraorbital involvement. DESIGN Retrospective evaluation. SETTING Tertiary care center. PATIENTS Patients with symptomatic frontoethmoidal or intraorbital osteomas who had been treated surgically from 1996 through 2011. INTERVENTION Sixty frontoethmoidal osteomas were treated surgically. The lesion involved the far lateral portion of the frontal sinus in 23 cases and the orbital region in 6 cases. In 31 cases, a purely endoscopic approach was performed while a combined procedure was used in 25 patients. In 4 patients, an exclusively external approach was required. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE No recurrence of osteoma. RESULTS Radical resection was obtained, except in the case of 2 lesions. No osteoma recurrence was observed during a mean follow-up of 72.6 months. CONCLUSIONS The size of the osteoma, far lateral extension of the tumor in the frontal sinus beyond the lamina papyracea, and intraorbital involvement are no longer absolute contraindications for purely transnasal endoscopic resection. What is important is that the surgeon should not be dogmatic but rather be ready to change his or her mind during surgery, shifting to an external approach when required.

Frontoethmoidal and Intraorbital Osteomas: Exploring the Limits of the Endoscopic Approach.

BATTAGLIA, PAOLO;BIGNAMI, MAURIZIO;CASTELNUOVO, PAOLO GIOCONDO MARIA;TURRI ZANONI, MARIO
2012

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To review our experience with the surgical treatment of frontoethmoidal osteomas, focusing on the osteomas that were either localized laterally in the frontal sinus or showing intraorbital involvement. DESIGN Retrospective evaluation. SETTING Tertiary care center. PATIENTS Patients with symptomatic frontoethmoidal or intraorbital osteomas who had been treated surgically from 1996 through 2011. INTERVENTION Sixty frontoethmoidal osteomas were treated surgically. The lesion involved the far lateral portion of the frontal sinus in 23 cases and the orbital region in 6 cases. In 31 cases, a purely endoscopic approach was performed while a combined procedure was used in 25 patients. In 4 patients, an exclusively external approach was required. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE No recurrence of osteoma. RESULTS Radical resection was obtained, except in the case of 2 lesions. No osteoma recurrence was observed during a mean follow-up of 72.6 months. CONCLUSIONS The size of the osteoma, far lateral extension of the tumor in the frontal sinus beyond the lamina papyracea, and intraorbital involvement are no longer absolute contraindications for purely transnasal endoscopic resection. What is important is that the surgeon should not be dogmatic but rather be ready to change his or her mind during surgery, shifting to an external approach when required.
Turri Zanoni, M; Dallan, I; Terranova, P; Battaglia, Paolo; Karligkiotis, A; Bignami, Maurizio; Castelnuovo, PAOLO GIOCONDO MARIA; TURRI ZANONI, Mario
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
ooa120024_498_504.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: DRM non definito
Dimensione 313.4 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
313.4 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11383/1759326
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 7
  • Scopus 41
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 36
social impact