Work-related injuries are a well known problem all around European Union (EU): every year, at least 170000 workers die and even more suffer severe and permanent injuries. Even if EU placed the goal of reducing this number by 25% by 2012, in many countries the situation remains unchanged despite the enforcement of increasingly stringent laws that, anyways, elude the most important question: why? Moreover, in spite of a lot of American and European studies demonstrated that at least 76% of work-related accidents are due to workers unsafe behaviors, blaming workers is not a effective solution because it eludes again the question: why a worker should act unsafe? An answer to this last question comes from studies about human behavior: a person acts a certain way because he is subject to a number of external stimuli, before and after his act. So, if a person receives a positive consequence as a reward for his behavior, he continues to output the same behavior. Till 80's, Behavior-Based Safety (B-BS) uses this mechanic to provide positive consequences to safe behaviors, instead of negative ones, increasing safety and reducing injuries. But does B-BS work? Even if a lot of literature case studies of successful B-BS implementation are present, all across the world, there is a lack of scientific experiments to unequivocally state that B-BS increases safe behaviors and reduces injuries. This work provides two different case studies, using not only a before-after analysis but also using an appropriate mathematical test (Young’s C Test), to examine workers’ behavior changes during time. The work puts in competition two different B-BS protocols, which share all the fundamentals but differ for start-up time and cost, applied on two different Italian industrial sites: a glass bottle factory and a paint factory. These protocols obtains the same results, demonstrating not only that B-BS works, but also that behavioral safety can be achieved at low cost even for small European industries.

Behavioral Safety: A way to decrease injuries at work (with science)

COPELLI, SABRINA;TORRETTA, VINCENZO
2012-01-01

Abstract

Work-related injuries are a well known problem all around European Union (EU): every year, at least 170000 workers die and even more suffer severe and permanent injuries. Even if EU placed the goal of reducing this number by 25% by 2012, in many countries the situation remains unchanged despite the enforcement of increasingly stringent laws that, anyways, elude the most important question: why? Moreover, in spite of a lot of American and European studies demonstrated that at least 76% of work-related accidents are due to workers unsafe behaviors, blaming workers is not a effective solution because it eludes again the question: why a worker should act unsafe? An answer to this last question comes from studies about human behavior: a person acts a certain way because he is subject to a number of external stimuli, before and after his act. So, if a person receives a positive consequence as a reward for his behavior, he continues to output the same behavior. Till 80's, Behavior-Based Safety (B-BS) uses this mechanic to provide positive consequences to safe behaviors, instead of negative ones, increasing safety and reducing injuries. But does B-BS work? Even if a lot of literature case studies of successful B-BS implementation are present, all across the world, there is a lack of scientific experiments to unequivocally state that B-BS increases safe behaviors and reduces injuries. This work provides two different case studies, using not only a before-after analysis but also using an appropriate mathematical test (Young’s C Test), to examine workers’ behavior changes during time. The work puts in competition two different B-BS protocols, which share all the fundamentals but differ for start-up time and cost, applied on two different Italian industrial sites: a glass bottle factory and a paint factory. These protocols obtains the same results, demonstrating not only that B-BS works, but also that behavioral safety can be achieved at low cost even for small European industries.
2012
11th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference and the Annual European Safety and Reliability Conference 2012, PSAM11 ESREL 2012
9781622764365
11th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference and The Annual European Safety and Reliability Conference 2012
Helsinki
25-29 giugno 2012
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
ESREL_Carlo.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Pre-print
Licenza: DRM non definito
Dimensione 66.18 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
66.18 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11383/1760763
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact