Background: Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is the most employed modality in the follow-up after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aorta (AA); repeated standard controls expose patients to a high cumulative radiation dose (RD). Purpose: To compare image quality and RD between 100 kV and 120 kV protocols in the same group of patients, previously treated with EVAR. Material and Methods: Thirty patients, who had performed a previous CTA at 120 kV, underwent a low dose CTA with the same 64-detector machine. Images were evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively. The influence of body mass index (BMI), considering three groups of patients (normal weight, overweight, and obese) was also assessed. RD values (volume CT dose index and effective dose) were calculated. Results: The mean qualitative score at 100 kV was worse than that at 120 kV, but the difference was not statistically significant and in all cases the image quality was satisfactory. At 100 kV the vessels mean attenuation value was significantly higher; signal-to-noise ratio significantly lower; contrast-to-noise ratio lower, but the difference was not significant. Regarding BMI, the difference in the qualitative score was significant in the obese group, but not in the other two groups; of the quantitative parameters only the signal-to-noise ratio presented a significant difference in the obese group. The average CTDIvol was reduced by 22% and the mean effective dose by 36% with the 100 kV protocol compared to the 120 kV protocol. Both differences were significant. Conclusion: The 100 kV protocol allowed a consistent RD reduction, maintaining a satisfactory image quality in all patients.
Role of low dose CT angiography in the follow-up after endovascular aneurysm repair of abdominal aorta
Fontana, F.;Piacentino, F.;FUGAZZOLA, CARLO
2015-01-01
Abstract
Background: Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is the most employed modality in the follow-up after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aorta (AA); repeated standard controls expose patients to a high cumulative radiation dose (RD). Purpose: To compare image quality and RD between 100 kV and 120 kV protocols in the same group of patients, previously treated with EVAR. Material and Methods: Thirty patients, who had performed a previous CTA at 120 kV, underwent a low dose CTA with the same 64-detector machine. Images were evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively. The influence of body mass index (BMI), considering three groups of patients (normal weight, overweight, and obese) was also assessed. RD values (volume CT dose index and effective dose) were calculated. Results: The mean qualitative score at 100 kV was worse than that at 120 kV, but the difference was not statistically significant and in all cases the image quality was satisfactory. At 100 kV the vessels mean attenuation value was significantly higher; signal-to-noise ratio significantly lower; contrast-to-noise ratio lower, but the difference was not significant. Regarding BMI, the difference in the qualitative score was significant in the obese group, but not in the other two groups; of the quantitative parameters only the signal-to-noise ratio presented a significant difference in the obese group. The average CTDIvol was reduced by 22% and the mean effective dose by 36% with the 100 kV protocol compared to the 120 kV protocol. Both differences were significant. Conclusion: The 100 kV protocol allowed a consistent RD reduction, maintaining a satisfactory image quality in all patients.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
