We present new Chandra X-ray observations of seven low-mass black holes () accreting at low-bolometric Eddington ratios between . We compare the X-ray properties of these seven low-mass active galactic nuclei (AGNs) to a total of 73 other low-mass AGNs in the literature with published Chandra observations (with Eddington ratios extending from ). We do not find any statistical differences between the low and high Eddington ratio low-mass AGNs in the distributions of their X-ray to ultraviolet luminosity ratios (), or in their X-ray spectral shapes. Furthermore, the distribution of low- AGNs displays an X-ray weak tail that is also observed within high- objects. Our results indicate that between , there is no systematic change in the structure of the accretion flow for active galaxies hosting black holes. We examine the accuracy of current bolometric luminosity estimates for our low- objects with new Chandra observations, and it is plausible that their Eddington ratios could be underestimated by up to an order of magnitude. If so, then in analogy with weak emission line quasars, we suggest that accretion from a geometrically thick, radiatively inefficient "slim disk" could explain their diverse properties in . Alternatively, if current Eddington ratios are correct (or overestimated), then the X-ray weak tail would imply that there is diversity in disk/corona couplings among individual low-mass objects. Finally, we conclude by noting that the distribution for low-mass black holes may have favorable consequences for the epoch of cosmic reionization being driven by AGN.

The X-ray properties of million solar mass black holes

GALLO, ELENA;HAARDT, FRANCESCO;
2016-01-01

Abstract

We present new Chandra X-ray observations of seven low-mass black holes () accreting at low-bolometric Eddington ratios between . We compare the X-ray properties of these seven low-mass active galactic nuclei (AGNs) to a total of 73 other low-mass AGNs in the literature with published Chandra observations (with Eddington ratios extending from ). We do not find any statistical differences between the low and high Eddington ratio low-mass AGNs in the distributions of their X-ray to ultraviolet luminosity ratios (), or in their X-ray spectral shapes. Furthermore, the distribution of low- AGNs displays an X-ray weak tail that is also observed within high- objects. Our results indicate that between , there is no systematic change in the structure of the accretion flow for active galaxies hosting black holes. We examine the accuracy of current bolometric luminosity estimates for our low- objects with new Chandra observations, and it is plausible that their Eddington ratios could be underestimated by up to an order of magnitude. If so, then in analogy with weak emission line quasars, we suggest that accretion from a geometrically thick, radiatively inefficient "slim disk" could explain their diverse properties in . Alternatively, if current Eddington ratios are correct (or overestimated), then the X-ray weak tail would imply that there is diversity in disk/corona couplings among individual low-mass objects. Finally, we conclude by noting that the distribution for low-mass black holes may have favorable consequences for the epoch of cosmic reionization being driven by AGN.
2016
http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/0004-637X/825/2/139/pdf
accretion, accretion disks; galaxies: active; X-rays: galaxies; Astronomy and Astrophysics; Space and Planetary Science
Plotkin, R. i. c. h. a. r. d. M.; Gallo, Elena; Haardt, Francesco; Miller, Brendan P.; Wood, Callum J. L.; Reines, Amy E.; Wu, Jianfeng; Greene, Jenny E.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11383/2061944
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 14
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 14
social impact