Background: Due to aging and resources limitation, septic patients are often admitted to medical wards (MWs). Early warning deterioration is a relevant issue in this setting. Unfortunately, a suitable prognostic score has not been identified, yet. Aim: To explore the ability of Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) to predict the in-hospital mortality in septic patients admitted to MWs. Design: Secondary analysis of a multicentric prospective study. Methods: Consecutive septic patients with positive blood culture admitted to 31 Italian MWs were included. Baseline characteristics, clinics, isolates, rate of transfer to ICU, MEWS was collected on admission according to the study protocol. The accuracy of MEWS in predicting the in-hospital mortality was assessed with the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV), likelihood ratio (LR) were calculated for different MEWS cut-offs and age/comorbidities subgroups. Results: In total 526 patients were included in this analysis. Median MEWS was (range 0-11). In-hospitalmortality was 14.8% and transfer to ICU 1.3%. Mortality progressively increased according to MEWS (3% in MEWS 0 vs. 27% in MEWS > 5; Chi square for trend P < 0.05). The AUC of MEWS in predicting in-hospitalmortality was 0.596 (95% CI, 0.524, 0.669). MEWS did not appear to have an adequate sensitivity, sensibility, PPV, NPV and LR both in the whole population and in the pre-specified subgroups. Conclusions: Our findings do not seemto support the use of MEWS to predict the in-hospitalmortality risk of sepsis in MWs.

Evaluation of the threshold value for the modified early warning score (MEWS) in medical septic patients: A secondary analysis of an Italian multicentric prospective cohort (SNOOPII study)

DENTALI, FRANCESCO
2017-01-01

Abstract

Background: Due to aging and resources limitation, septic patients are often admitted to medical wards (MWs). Early warning deterioration is a relevant issue in this setting. Unfortunately, a suitable prognostic score has not been identified, yet. Aim: To explore the ability of Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) to predict the in-hospital mortality in septic patients admitted to MWs. Design: Secondary analysis of a multicentric prospective study. Methods: Consecutive septic patients with positive blood culture admitted to 31 Italian MWs were included. Baseline characteristics, clinics, isolates, rate of transfer to ICU, MEWS was collected on admission according to the study protocol. The accuracy of MEWS in predicting the in-hospital mortality was assessed with the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV), likelihood ratio (LR) were calculated for different MEWS cut-offs and age/comorbidities subgroups. Results: In total 526 patients were included in this analysis. Median MEWS was (range 0-11). In-hospitalmortality was 14.8% and transfer to ICU 1.3%. Mortality progressively increased according to MEWS (3% in MEWS 0 vs. 27% in MEWS > 5; Chi square for trend P < 0.05). The AUC of MEWS in predicting in-hospitalmortality was 0.596 (95% CI, 0.524, 0.669). MEWS did not appear to have an adequate sensitivity, sensibility, PPV, NPV and LR both in the whole population and in the pre-specified subgroups. Conclusions: Our findings do not seemto support the use of MEWS to predict the in-hospitalmortality risk of sepsis in MWs.
2017
http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/
Medicine (all)
Tirotta, D; Gambacorta, M.; La Regina, M.; Attardo, T.; Lo Gullo, A.; Panzone, F.; Mazzone, A.; Campanini, M.; Dentali, Francesco
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11383/2064488
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 8
  • Scopus 16
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 18
social impact