OBJECTIVES: To describe our experience with the management and the results of stent-graft (SG) repair of acute type B aortic intramural hematoma (B-IMH). METHODS: Between January 2005 and July 2016, we identified 41 B-IMHs. Major end-points were early and long-term survival, aortic remodeling, freedom from aortic-related mortality (ARM), and freedom from reintervention. RESULTS: Thirty-one (76%) patients eventually underwent SG repair: 16 (52%) cases in the acute phase, and 6 (19%) in the subacute (14-30 days) phase. Nine (29%) patients showed aortic lesion progression in the follow-up despite best medical treatment (BMT), and required SG repair in the chronic phase. The presence of ulcer-like projections at the admission computed tomography angiography was significantly higher in patients who eventually required SG repair (5% vs. 36%, OR: 4.08, P = .043). At 12 months, while ARM showed a trend in favor of SG (84% ± 10 vs. 100%; Log-rank: P = .075), the freedom from aortic progression was significantly lower in the SG group (64% ± 13 vs. 94% ± 5; Log-rank: P = .002). Median follow-up was 31 months (range, 2-96; IQR, 11-62.5). Freedom from ARM and freedom from aortic reintervention was 92% ± 5 (95%CI: 75-98) at 12 months. Aortic remodeling was observed in 26 (84%) patients. No differences were noted between patients treated with SG in acute vs. chronic phase. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, B-IMH was associated with 47% aortic adverse event rate in the follow-up with BMT alone. At mid-term, results of SG repair are encouraging.
Best Medical Treatment and Selective Stent-GraftRepair for Acute Type B Aortic Intramural Hematoma
Piffaretti, Gabriele
Primo
;Lomazzi, ChiaraSecondo
;Castelli, PatrizioSupervision
;Tozzi, MatteoData Curation
2018-01-01
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To describe our experience with the management and the results of stent-graft (SG) repair of acute type B aortic intramural hematoma (B-IMH). METHODS: Between January 2005 and July 2016, we identified 41 B-IMHs. Major end-points were early and long-term survival, aortic remodeling, freedom from aortic-related mortality (ARM), and freedom from reintervention. RESULTS: Thirty-one (76%) patients eventually underwent SG repair: 16 (52%) cases in the acute phase, and 6 (19%) in the subacute (14-30 days) phase. Nine (29%) patients showed aortic lesion progression in the follow-up despite best medical treatment (BMT), and required SG repair in the chronic phase. The presence of ulcer-like projections at the admission computed tomography angiography was significantly higher in patients who eventually required SG repair (5% vs. 36%, OR: 4.08, P = .043). At 12 months, while ARM showed a trend in favor of SG (84% ± 10 vs. 100%; Log-rank: P = .075), the freedom from aortic progression was significantly lower in the SG group (64% ± 13 vs. 94% ± 5; Log-rank: P = .002). Median follow-up was 31 months (range, 2-96; IQR, 11-62.5). Freedom from ARM and freedom from aortic reintervention was 92% ± 5 (95%CI: 75-98) at 12 months. Aortic remodeling was observed in 26 (84%) patients. No differences were noted between patients treated with SG in acute vs. chronic phase. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, B-IMH was associated with 47% aortic adverse event rate in the follow-up with BMT alone. At mid-term, results of SG repair are encouraging.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
TEVAR for IMH.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
DRM non definito
Dimensione
813.89 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
813.89 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.