Objectives: To explore contemporary antibiotic management of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in hospitals.Methods: Cross-sectional, internet-based questionnaire survey. We contacted representatives of all hospitals with more than 800 acute-care hospital beds in France, Greece, Israel, Italy, Kosovo, Slovenia, Spain and selected hospitals in the USA. We asked respondents to describe the most common actual practice at their hospital regarding management of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa through close-ended questions.Results: Between January and June 2017, 115 of 141 eligible hospitals participated (overall response rate 81.6%, country-specific rates 66.7%-100%). Most were tertiary-care (99/114, 86.8%), university-affiliated (110/115, 89.1%) hospitals and most representatives were infectious disease specialists (99/115, 86.1%). Combination therapy was prescribed in 114/115 (99.1%) hospitals at least occasionally. Respondents were more likely to consider combination therapy when treating bacteraemia, pneumonia and central nervous system infections and for Enterobacteriaceae, P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii similarly. Combination of a polymyxin with a carbapenem was used in most cases, whereas combinations of a polymyxin with tigecycline, an aminoglycoside, fosfomycin or rifampicin were also common. Monotherapy was used for treatment of complicated urinary tract infections, usually with an aminoglycoside or a polymyxin. The intended goal of combination therapy was to improve the effectiveness of the treatment and to prevent development of resistance. In general, respondents shared the misconception that combination therapy is supported by strong scientific evidence.Conclusions: Combination therapy was the preferred treatment strategy for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria among hospital representatives, even though high-quality evidence for carbapenem-based combination therapy is lacking. (c) 2018 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Antibiotic treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli: an international ESCMID cross-sectional survey among infectious diseases specialists practicing in large hospitals

Dalla Gasperina, D.;
2018-01-01

Abstract

Objectives: To explore contemporary antibiotic management of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in hospitals.Methods: Cross-sectional, internet-based questionnaire survey. We contacted representatives of all hospitals with more than 800 acute-care hospital beds in France, Greece, Israel, Italy, Kosovo, Slovenia, Spain and selected hospitals in the USA. We asked respondents to describe the most common actual practice at their hospital regarding management of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa through close-ended questions.Results: Between January and June 2017, 115 of 141 eligible hospitals participated (overall response rate 81.6%, country-specific rates 66.7%-100%). Most were tertiary-care (99/114, 86.8%), university-affiliated (110/115, 89.1%) hospitals and most representatives were infectious disease specialists (99/115, 86.1%). Combination therapy was prescribed in 114/115 (99.1%) hospitals at least occasionally. Respondents were more likely to consider combination therapy when treating bacteraemia, pneumonia and central nervous system infections and for Enterobacteriaceae, P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii similarly. Combination of a polymyxin with a carbapenem was used in most cases, whereas combinations of a polymyxin with tigecycline, an aminoglycoside, fosfomycin or rifampicin were also common. Monotherapy was used for treatment of complicated urinary tract infections, usually with an aminoglycoside or a polymyxin. The intended goal of combination therapy was to improve the effectiveness of the treatment and to prevent development of resistance. In general, respondents shared the misconception that combination therapy is supported by strong scientific evidence.Conclusions: Combination therapy was the preferred treatment strategy for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria among hospital representatives, even though high-quality evidence for carbapenem-based combination therapy is lacking. (c) 2018 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
2018
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1469-0691
Acinetobacter baumannii; Carbapenem; Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli; Combination therapy; Enterobacteriaceae; Polymyxin; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Survey; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Carbapenems; Cross Infection; Cross-Sectional Studies; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Gram-Negative Bacteria; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Hospitals; Humans; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Surveys and Questionnaires; Microbiology (medical); Infectious Diseases
Papst, L.; Beović, B.; Pulcini, C.; Durante-Mangoni, E.; Rodríguez-Baño, J.; Kaye, K. S.; Daikos, G. L.; Raka, L.; Paul, M.; Abbo, L.; Abgueguen, P.; Almirante, B.; Azzini, A. M.; Bani-Sadr, F.; Bassetti, M.; Ben-Ami, R.; Beović, B.; Béraud, G.; Botelho-Nevers, E.; Bou, G.; Boutoille, D.; Cabié, A.; Cacopardo, B.; Cascio, A.; Cassir, N.; Castelli, F.; Cecala, M.; Charmillon, A.; Chirouze, C.; Cisneros, J. M.; Colmenero, J. D.; Coppola, N.; Corcione, S.; Daikos, G. L.; Dalla Gasperina, D.; De la Calle Cabrera, C.; Delobel, P.; Di Caprio, D.; Durante Mangoni, E.; Dupon, M.; Ettahar, N.; Falagas, M. E.; Falcone, M.; Fariñas, M. C.; Faure, E.; Forestier, E.; Foti, G.; Gallagher, J.; Gattuso, G.; Gendrin, V.; Gentile, I.; Giacobbe, D. R.; Gogos, C. A.; Grandiere Perez, L.; Hansmann, Y.; Horcajada, J. P.; Iacobello, C.; Jacob, J. T.; Justo, J. A.; Kernéis, S.; Komnos, A.; Kotnik Kevorkijan, B.; Lebeaux, D.; Le Berre, R.; Lechiche, C.; Le Moxing, V.; Lescure, F. X.; Libanore, M.; Martinot, M.; Merino de Lucas, E.; Mondain, V.; Mondello, P.; Montejo, M.; Mootien, J.; Muñoz, P.; Nir-Paz, R.; Pan, A.; Paño-Pardo, J. R.; Patel, G.; Paul, M.; Pérez Rodríguez, M. T.; Piroth, L.; Pogue, J.; Potoski, B. A.; Pourcher, V.; Pyrpasopoulou, A.; Rahav, G.; Rizzi, M.; Rodríguez-Baño, J.; Salavert, M.; Scheetz, M.; Sims, M.; Spahija, G.; Stefani, S.; Stefos, A.; Tamma, P. D.; Tattevin, P.; Tedesco, A.; Torre-Cisneros, J.; Tripolitsioti, P.; Tsiodras, S.; Uomo, G.; Verdon, R.; Viale, P.; Vitrat, V.; Weinberger, M.; Wiener-Well, Y.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11383/2077802
 Attenzione

L'Ateneo sottopone a validazione solo i file PDF allegati

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 28
  • Scopus 61
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 61
social impact