Essentials Predicting recurrences may guide therapy after unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE). We evaluated the DASH score in 827 patients with unprovoked VTE to verify prediction accuracy. A DASH score ≤ 1 had a cumulative recurrence risk at 1 year of 3.6%, as predicted by the model. The DASH score performed better in younger (< 65 years old) subjects.

External validation of the DASH prediction rule: a retrospective cohort study

TESTA, SIMONE;Ageno W.
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
Dentali F.;
2017-01-01

Abstract

Essentials Predicting recurrences may guide therapy after unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE). We evaluated the DASH score in 827 patients with unprovoked VTE to verify prediction accuracy. A DASH score ≤ 1 had a cumulative recurrence risk at 1 year of 3.6%, as predicted by the model. The DASH score performed better in younger (< 65 years old) subjects.
2017
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1538-7836
D-dimer; prediction models; recurrence; risk; venous thromboembolism; Administration, Oral; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Anticoagulants; Biomarkers; Decision Support Techniques; Female; Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products; Humans; Incidence; Italy; Male; Middle Aged; Predictive Value of Tests; Pulmonary Embolism; Recurrence; Reproducibility of Results; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis
Tosetto, A.; Testa, Simone; Martinelli, I.; Poli, D.; Cosmi, B.; Lodigiani, C.; Ageno, W.; De Stefano, V.; Falanga, A.; Nichele, I.; Paoletti, O.; Buc...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11383/2083144
 Attenzione

L'Ateneo sottopone a validazione solo i file PDF allegati

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 17
  • Scopus 64
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 52
social impact