The diaphragm action of slab/roof decks ensures the collaboration of different parts of the lateral load resisting system of a building. In reinforced concrete precast buildings for industrial/commercial halls, not seldom the deck is not provided with a cast-in-situ topping: this results into diaphragm action to rely upon the floor mechanical connections alone. In this study, the efficacy of three different typical floor-beam connections, namely hot-rolled angle brackets, cold-formed angle brackets and dowel bars, on the diaphragm action of the deck has been investigated. To this purpose, simplified macroscopic “behaviour models” have been proposed, based on the results of monotonic and cyclic tests carried out within the framework of the research project Safecast (FP7-SME-2007-2; GA 218417/2009). A numerical model of a dry-assembled precast structure with mechanical floor-to-beam connections has been checked against the results of cyclic and pseudo-dynamic tests carried out on a full-scale prototype within the framework of the Precast Structures EC8 project (GA G6RD-CT-2002-70002). Non-linear dynamic analyses have then been performed to investigate the diaphragm action effectiveness of the three different technological solutions to connect slab and beams considering a seismic action orthogonal to the roof elements. Different stiffness distributions of the lateral load resisting system have been considered, investigating the possible bracing effect induced by an integrated connection system of the external cladding panels. A simplified “design-wise” analytical interpretation of the phenomenon is also formulated and checked against the numerical results.

Efficacy of roof-to-beam mechanical connections on the diaphragm behaviour of precast decks with spaced roof elements

Dal Lago, Bruno;
2018-01-01

Abstract

The diaphragm action of slab/roof decks ensures the collaboration of different parts of the lateral load resisting system of a building. In reinforced concrete precast buildings for industrial/commercial halls, not seldom the deck is not provided with a cast-in-situ topping: this results into diaphragm action to rely upon the floor mechanical connections alone. In this study, the efficacy of three different typical floor-beam connections, namely hot-rolled angle brackets, cold-formed angle brackets and dowel bars, on the diaphragm action of the deck has been investigated. To this purpose, simplified macroscopic “behaviour models” have been proposed, based on the results of monotonic and cyclic tests carried out within the framework of the research project Safecast (FP7-SME-2007-2; GA 218417/2009). A numerical model of a dry-assembled precast structure with mechanical floor-to-beam connections has been checked against the results of cyclic and pseudo-dynamic tests carried out on a full-scale prototype within the framework of the Precast Structures EC8 project (GA G6RD-CT-2002-70002). Non-linear dynamic analyses have then been performed to investigate the diaphragm action effectiveness of the three different technological solutions to connect slab and beams considering a seismic action orthogonal to the roof elements. Different stiffness distributions of the lateral load resisting system have been considered, investigating the possible bracing effect induced by an integrated connection system of the external cladding panels. A simplified “design-wise” analytical interpretation of the phenomenon is also formulated and checked against the numerical results.
2018
Precast concreteSeismic performanceRoof-to-beam connectionsDiaphragm actionPseudo-dynamic testingNon-linear analysisSeismic design
Dal Lago, Bruno; Ferrara, Liberato
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11383/2086269
 Attenzione

L'Ateneo sottopone a validazione solo i file PDF allegati

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 26
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 22
social impact