Purpose: Over the last two decades, noninvasive ventilation (NIV) has been proposed in various causes of acute respiratory failure (ARF) but some indications are debated. Current trends in NIV use are unknown. Methods: Comparison of three multicenter prospective audits including all patients receiving mechanical ventilation and conducted in 1997, 2002, and 2011 in francophone countries. Results: Among the 4132 patients enrolled, 2094 (51 %) required ventilatory support for ARF and 2038 (49 %) for non-respiratory conditions. Overall NIV use was markedly increased in 2010/11 compared to 1997 and 2002 (37 % of mechanically ventilated patients vs. 16 % and 28 %, P < 0.05). In 2010/11, the use of first-line NIV for ARF had reached a plateau (24 % vs. 16 % and 23 %, P < 0.05) whereas pre-ICU and post-extubation NIV had substantially increased (11 % vs. 4 % and 11 % vs. 7 %, respectively, P < 0.05). First-line NIV remained stable in acute-on-chronic RF, continued to increase in cardiogenic pulmonary edema, but decreased in de novo ARF (16 % in 2010/11 vs. 23 % in 2002, P < 0.05). The NIV success rate increased from 56 % in 2002 to 70 % in 2010/11 and remained the lowest in de novo ARF. NIV failure in de novo ARF was associated with increased mortality in 2002 but not in 2010/11. Mortality decreased over time, and overall, NIV use was associated with a lower mortality. Conclusion: Increases in NIV use and success rate, an overall decrease in mortality, and a decrease of the adverse impact NIV failure has in de novo ARF suggest better patient selection and greater proficiency of staff in administering NIV. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT01449331.

Changing use of noninvasive ventilation in critically ill patients: trends over 15 years in francophone countries

Carlucci A.;
2016-01-01

Abstract

Purpose: Over the last two decades, noninvasive ventilation (NIV) has been proposed in various causes of acute respiratory failure (ARF) but some indications are debated. Current trends in NIV use are unknown. Methods: Comparison of three multicenter prospective audits including all patients receiving mechanical ventilation and conducted in 1997, 2002, and 2011 in francophone countries. Results: Among the 4132 patients enrolled, 2094 (51 %) required ventilatory support for ARF and 2038 (49 %) for non-respiratory conditions. Overall NIV use was markedly increased in 2010/11 compared to 1997 and 2002 (37 % of mechanically ventilated patients vs. 16 % and 28 %, P < 0.05). In 2010/11, the use of first-line NIV for ARF had reached a plateau (24 % vs. 16 % and 23 %, P < 0.05) whereas pre-ICU and post-extubation NIV had substantially increased (11 % vs. 4 % and 11 % vs. 7 %, respectively, P < 0.05). First-line NIV remained stable in acute-on-chronic RF, continued to increase in cardiogenic pulmonary edema, but decreased in de novo ARF (16 % in 2010/11 vs. 23 % in 2002, P < 0.05). The NIV success rate increased from 56 % in 2002 to 70 % in 2010/11 and remained the lowest in de novo ARF. NIV failure in de novo ARF was associated with increased mortality in 2002 but not in 2010/11. Mortality decreased over time, and overall, NIV use was associated with a lower mortality. Conclusion: Increases in NIV use and success rate, an overall decrease in mortality, and a decrease of the adverse impact NIV failure has in de novo ARF suggest better patient selection and greater proficiency of staff in administering NIV. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT01449331.
link.springer.de/link/service/journals/00134/index.htm
Acute respiratory failure; Mechanical ventilation; Non-invasive ventilation; Outcome
Demoule, A.; Chevret, S.; Carlucci, A.; Kouatchet, A.; Jaber, S.; Meziani, F.; Schmidt, M.; Schnell, D.; Clergue, C.; Aboab, J.; Rabbat, A.; Eon, B.; Guerin, C.; Georges, H.; Zuber, B.; Dellamonica, J.; Das, V.; Cousson, J.; Perez, D.; Brochard, L.; Azoulay, E.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11383/2087431
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 132
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 108
social impact