BACKGROUND: Endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are xenobiotics that mimic the interaction of natural hormones and alter synthesis, transport, or metabolic pathways. The prospect of EDCs causing adverse health effects in humans and wildlife has led to the development of scientific and regulatory approaches for evaluating bioactivity. This need is being addressed using high-throughput screening (HTS) in vitro approaches and computational modeling. OBJECTIVES: In support of the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) led two worldwide consortiums to virtually screen chemicals for their potential estrogenic and androgenic activities. Here, we describe the Collaborative Modeling Project for Androgen Receptor Activity (CoMPARA) efforts, which follows the steps of the Collaborative Estrogen Receptor Activity Prediction Project (CERAPP). METHODS: The CoMPARA list of screened chemicals built on CERAPP’s list of 32,464 chemicals to include additional chemicals of interest, as well as simulated ToxCast™ metabolites, totaling 55,450 chemical structures. Computational toxicology scientists from 25 international groups contributed 91 predictive models for binding, agonist, and antagonist activity predictions. Models were underpinned by a common training set of 1,746 chemicals compiled from a combined data set of 11 ToxCast™/Tox21 HTS in vitro assays. RESULTS: The resulting models were evaluated using curated literature data extracted from different sources. To overcome the limitations of single-model approaches, CoMPARA predictions were combined into consensus models that provided averaged predictive accuracy of approximately 80% for the evaluation set. DISCUSSION: The strengths and limitations of the consensus predictions were discussed with example chemicals; then, the models were implemented into the free and open-source OPERA application to enable screening of new chemicals with a defined applicability domain and accuracy assessment. This implementation was used to screen the entire EPA DSSTox database of ∼875,000 chemicals, and their predicted AR activities have been made available on the EPA CompTox Chemicals dashboard and National Toxicology Program’s Integrated Chemical Environment. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP5580.

Compara: Collaborative modeling project for androgen receptor activity

Bhhatarai B.;Gramatica P.;Liu H.;Papa E.;Sangion A.;
2020

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are xenobiotics that mimic the interaction of natural hormones and alter synthesis, transport, or metabolic pathways. The prospect of EDCs causing adverse health effects in humans and wildlife has led to the development of scientific and regulatory approaches for evaluating bioactivity. This need is being addressed using high-throughput screening (HTS) in vitro approaches and computational modeling. OBJECTIVES: In support of the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) led two worldwide consortiums to virtually screen chemicals for their potential estrogenic and androgenic activities. Here, we describe the Collaborative Modeling Project for Androgen Receptor Activity (CoMPARA) efforts, which follows the steps of the Collaborative Estrogen Receptor Activity Prediction Project (CERAPP). METHODS: The CoMPARA list of screened chemicals built on CERAPP’s list of 32,464 chemicals to include additional chemicals of interest, as well as simulated ToxCast™ metabolites, totaling 55,450 chemical structures. Computational toxicology scientists from 25 international groups contributed 91 predictive models for binding, agonist, and antagonist activity predictions. Models were underpinned by a common training set of 1,746 chemicals compiled from a combined data set of 11 ToxCast™/Tox21 HTS in vitro assays. RESULTS: The resulting models were evaluated using curated literature data extracted from different sources. To overcome the limitations of single-model approaches, CoMPARA predictions were combined into consensus models that provided averaged predictive accuracy of approximately 80% for the evaluation set. DISCUSSION: The strengths and limitations of the consensus predictions were discussed with example chemicals; then, the models were implemented into the free and open-source OPERA application to enable screening of new chemicals with a defined applicability domain and accuracy assessment. This implementation was used to screen the entire EPA DSSTox database of ∼875,000 chemicals, and their predicted AR activities have been made available on the EPA CompTox Chemicals dashboard and National Toxicology Program’s Integrated Chemical Environment. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP5580.
Mansouri, K.; Kleinstreuer, N.; Abdelaziz, A. M.; Alberga, D.; Alves, V. M.; Andersson, P. L.; Andrade, C. H.; Bai, F.; Balabin, I.; Ballabio, D.; Benfenati, E.; Bhhatarai, B.; Boyer, S.; Chen, J.; Consonni, V.; Farag, S.; Fourches, D.; Garcia-Sosa, A. T.; Gramatica, P.; Grisoni, F.; Grulke, C. M.; Hong, H.; Horvath, D.; Hu, X.; Huang, R.; Jeliazkova, N.; Li, J.; Li, X.; Liu, H.; Manganelli, S.; Mangiatordi, G. F.; Maran, U.; Marcou, G.; Martin, T.; Muratov, E.; Nguyen, D. -T.; Nicolotti, O.; Nikolov, N. G.; Norinder, U.; Papa, E.; Petitjean, M.; Piir, G.; Pogodin, P.; Poroikov, V.; Qiao, X.; Richard, A. M.; Roncaglioni, A.; Ruiz, P.; Rupakheti, C.; Sakkiah, S.; Sangion, A.; Schramm, K. -W.; Selvaraj, C.; Shah, I.; Sild, S.; Sun, L.; Taboureau, O.; Tang, Y.; Tetko, I. V.; Todeschini, R.; Tong, W.; Trisciuzzi, D.; Tropsha, A.; Van Den Driessche, G.; Varnek, A.; Wang, Z.; Wedebye, E. B.; Williams, A. J.; Xie, H.; Zakharov, A. V.; Zheng, Z.; Judson, R. S.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11383/2087887
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 27
  • Scopus 71
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 70
social impact