OBJECTIVES: This study compares the uniportal with the 3-portal video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) by examining the data collected in the Italian VATS Group Database. The primary end point was early postoperative pain; secondary end points were intraoperative and postoperative complications, surgical time, number of dissected lymph nodes and length of stay. METHODS: This was an observational, retrospective, cohort, multicentre study on data collected by 49 Italian thoracic units. Inclusion criteria were clinical stage I-II non-small-cell lung cancer, uniportal or 3-portal VATS lobectomy and R0 resection. Exclusion criteria were cT3 disease, previous thoracic malignancy, induction therapy, significant comorbidities and conversion to other techniques. The pain parameter was dichotomized: the numeric rating scale ≤3 described mild pain, whereas the numeric rating scale score >3 described moderate/severe pain. The propensity score-adjusted generalized estimating equation was used to compare the uniportal with 3-portal lobectomy. RESULTS: Among 4338 patients enrolled from January 2014 to July 2017, 1980 met the inclusion criteria; 1808 patients underwent 3-portal lobectomy and 172 uniportal surgery. The adjusted generalized estimating equation regression model using the propensity score showed that over time pain decreased in both groups (P < 0.001). There was a statistical difference on the second and third postoperative days; odds ratio (OR) 2.28 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.62-3.21; P < 0.001] and OR 2.58 (95% CI 1.74-3.83; P < 0.001), respectively. The uniportal-VATS group had higher operative time (P < 0.001), shorter chest drain permanence (P < 0.001) and shorter length of stay (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Data from the Italian VATS Group Database showed that in clinical practice uniportal lobectomy seems to entail a higher risk of moderate/severe pain on second and third postoperative days.

Uniportal and three-portal video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: Analysis of the Italian video-assisted thoracic surgery group database

Imperatori A.;Rotolo N.;
2019-01-01

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study compares the uniportal with the 3-portal video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) by examining the data collected in the Italian VATS Group Database. The primary end point was early postoperative pain; secondary end points were intraoperative and postoperative complications, surgical time, number of dissected lymph nodes and length of stay. METHODS: This was an observational, retrospective, cohort, multicentre study on data collected by 49 Italian thoracic units. Inclusion criteria were clinical stage I-II non-small-cell lung cancer, uniportal or 3-portal VATS lobectomy and R0 resection. Exclusion criteria were cT3 disease, previous thoracic malignancy, induction therapy, significant comorbidities and conversion to other techniques. The pain parameter was dichotomized: the numeric rating scale ≤3 described mild pain, whereas the numeric rating scale score >3 described moderate/severe pain. The propensity score-adjusted generalized estimating equation was used to compare the uniportal with 3-portal lobectomy. RESULTS: Among 4338 patients enrolled from January 2014 to July 2017, 1980 met the inclusion criteria; 1808 patients underwent 3-portal lobectomy and 172 uniportal surgery. The adjusted generalized estimating equation regression model using the propensity score showed that over time pain decreased in both groups (P < 0.001). There was a statistical difference on the second and third postoperative days; odds ratio (OR) 2.28 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.62-3.21; P < 0.001] and OR 2.58 (95% CI 1.74-3.83; P < 0.001), respectively. The uniportal-VATS group had higher operative time (P < 0.001), shorter chest drain permanence (P < 0.001) and shorter length of stay (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Data from the Italian VATS Group Database showed that in clinical practice uniportal lobectomy seems to entail a higher risk of moderate/severe pain on second and third postoperative days.
2019
Italian VATS Group; Lobectomy; Postoperative pain; Three-portal; Uniportal; Video-assisted thoracic surgery; Aged; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Equipment Design; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Neoplasm Staging; Operative Time; Pneumonectomy; Retrospective Studies; Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Tosi, D.; Nosotti, M.; Bonitta, G.; Mazzucco, A.; Righi, I.; Mendogni, P.; Rosso, L.; Palleschi, A.; Rocco, G.; Crisci, R.; Mancuso, M.; Pernazza, F.; Refai, M.; Bortolotti, L.; Rizzardi, G.; Gargiulo, G.; Dolci, G. P.; Perkmann, R.; Zaraca, F.; Benvenuti, M.; Gavezzoli, D.; Cherchi, R.; Ferrari, P.; Mucilli, F.; Camplese, P.; Melloni, G.; Mazza, F.; Cavallesco, G.; Maniscalco, P.; Voltolini, L.; Gonfiotti, A.; Stella, F.; Argnani, D.; Pariscenti, G. L.; Surrente, C.; Lopez, C.; Droghetti, A.; Giovanardi, M.; Breda, C.; Lo Giudice, F.; Alloisio, M.; Bottoni, E.; Spaggiari, L.; Gasparri, R.; Torre, M.; Rinaldo, A.; Nosotti, M.; Rosso, L.; Negri, G. P.; Bandiera, A.; Stefani, A.; Natali, P.; Scarci, M.; Pirondini, E.; Curcio, C.; Amore, D.; Baietto, G.; Casadio, C.; Nicotra, S.; Dell'Amore, A.; Bertani, A.; Russo, E.; Ampollini, L.; Carbognani, P.; Puma, F.; Vinci, D.; Andreetti, C.; Poggi, C.; Cardillo, G.; Margaritora, S.; Meacci, E.; Luzzi, L.; Ghisalberti, M.; Crisci, R.; Zaccagna, G.; Lausi, P.; Guerrera, F.; Fontana, D.; Della Beffa, V.; Morelli, A.; Londero, F.; Imperatori, A.; Rotolo, N.; Terzi, A.; Viti, A.; Infante, M.; Benato, C.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11383/2097503
 Attenzione

L'Ateneo sottopone a validazione solo i file PDF allegati

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 7
  • Scopus 15
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 15
social impact