Purpose. Complications of surgical incision include pathological scars with functional, cosmetic or psychological consequences. Postsurgical scar assessment is fundamental for a complete functional evaluation and as an outcome measure. Scar assessment scales are here reviewed and discussed from a clinical and psychometric point of view, with a clear definition of different scar parameters. Method. An extensive review of the English-language literature was conducted using the Medline database. Results. Four scales that satisfy psychometrical criteria were identified: Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), Manchester Scar Scale (MSS) and Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES). Conclusions. To date, VSS is the most widely used rating scale for scars but POSAS appears the most comprehensive, taking into account the important aspect of patient’s perspective. The MSS has been never used for research, while SBSES has only been very recently proposed.

How to assess postsurgical scars: A review of outcome measures

Ferriero G
Secondo
;
2009-01-01

Abstract

Purpose. Complications of surgical incision include pathological scars with functional, cosmetic or psychological consequences. Postsurgical scar assessment is fundamental for a complete functional evaluation and as an outcome measure. Scar assessment scales are here reviewed and discussed from a clinical and psychometric point of view, with a clear definition of different scar parameters. Method. An extensive review of the English-language literature was conducted using the Medline database. Results. Four scales that satisfy psychometrical criteria were identified: Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), Manchester Scar Scale (MSS) and Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES). Conclusions. To date, VSS is the most widely used rating scale for scars but POSAS appears the most comprehensive, taking into account the important aspect of patient’s perspective. The MSS has been never used for research, while SBSES has only been very recently proposed.
2009
Scars, outcome measures
Vercelli, S; Ferriero, G; Sartorio, F; Stissi, V; Franchignoni, F.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2009_Disabil_Rehabil.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: DRM non definito
Dimensione 444.84 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
444.84 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11383/2099138
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 47
  • Scopus 157
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 142
social impact