Leucinostatin A is one of the most potent antiprotozoal compounds ever described, but little was known on structure‐activity relationships (SAR). We used Trypanosoma brucei as a protozoal model organism to test synthetically modified derivatives, resulting in simplified but equally active compounds 2 (ZHAWOC6025) and 4 (ZHAWOC6027), which were subsequently modified in all regions of the molecule to gain an in‐depth SAR understanding. The antiprotozoal SAR matched SAR in phospholipid liposomes, where membrane integrity, leaking, and dynamics were studied. The mode of action is discussed based on a structure‐activity analysis of derivatives in efficacy, ultrastructural studies in T. brucei , and artificial membrane models, mimicking membrane stability and membrane potential. The main site of antiprotozoal action of natural and synthetic leucinostatins lies in the destabilization of the inner mitochondrial membrane, as demonstrated by ultrastructural analysis, electron microscopy and mitochondrial staining. Long‐time sublethal exposure of T. brucei (200 passages) and siRNA screening of 12000 mutants showed no signs of resistance development to the synthetic derivatives.

Antiprotozoal structure-activity relationships of synthetic leucinostatin derivatives and elucidation of their mode of action

Silvia Gazzola;
2021-01-01

Abstract

Leucinostatin A is one of the most potent antiprotozoal compounds ever described, but little was known on structure‐activity relationships (SAR). We used Trypanosoma brucei as a protozoal model organism to test synthetically modified derivatives, resulting in simplified but equally active compounds 2 (ZHAWOC6025) and 4 (ZHAWOC6027), which were subsequently modified in all regions of the molecule to gain an in‐depth SAR understanding. The antiprotozoal SAR matched SAR in phospholipid liposomes, where membrane integrity, leaking, and dynamics were studied. The mode of action is discussed based on a structure‐activity analysis of derivatives in efficacy, ultrastructural studies in T. brucei , and artificial membrane models, mimicking membrane stability and membrane potential. The main site of antiprotozoal action of natural and synthetic leucinostatins lies in the destabilization of the inner mitochondrial membrane, as demonstrated by ultrastructural analysis, electron microscopy and mitochondrial staining. Long‐time sublethal exposure of T. brucei (200 passages) and siRNA screening of 12000 mutants showed no signs of resistance development to the synthetic derivatives.
2021
Brand, Michael; Lei Wang, Dr.; Stefano Agnello, Dr.; Gazzola, Silvia; Gall, Flavio M.; Raguž, Luka; Marcel Kaiser, Dr.; Schmidt, Dr. Remo S.; Ritschl, Amélie; Jelk, Jennifer; Andrew Hemphill, Prof.  Dr.; Pascal Mäser, Prof.  Dr.; Peter Bütikofer, Prof.  Dr.; Michael Adams, Dr.; Rainer Riedl, Prof.  Dr.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11383/2113265
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact