This paper investigated the spatial effects of innovation and entrepreneurial activity on income inequality of 64 middle-and-low-income countries and 25 high-income countries from 2000 to 2016. Spatial panel methods are used to address the issues of spatial dependency and spillover effects among neighboring countries. We find the following: (1) Evidence of spatial correlations in income inequality across countries. (2) A positive direct effect between innovation and inequality but a positive feedback from innovation. (3) The relationship between entrepreneurial activity and inequality is mixed. The relationship is positive if entrepreneurial activity is proxied by self-employment but negative if measured by entry rate. Both produced a negative feedback effect, which suggests that entrepreneurial activity is linked to rising inequality in developing countries. (4) A positive spillover effect from innovation and negative spillover effect from self-employment. We also investigated whether the linkages between innovation–inequality and entrepreneurial activity–inequality are subject to a country-level institutional quality. The findings suggest that the interaction terms have negative effects on income inequality. For policy implications, innovation sharing should be encouraged to reduce monopoly power that increases the tendency for wealth accumulation. Another possible solution to increase entrepreneurial activities while reducing inequality is for governments in developing countries to offer various schemes targeted at the poor, especially finance.

Spillover effects of innovation and entrepreneurial activity on income inequality in developing countries: A spatial panel approach

Asamoah, Lawrence Adu
Primo
;
Figari, Francesco;Vezzulli, Andrea
2021-01-01

Abstract

This paper investigated the spatial effects of innovation and entrepreneurial activity on income inequality of 64 middle-and-low-income countries and 25 high-income countries from 2000 to 2016. Spatial panel methods are used to address the issues of spatial dependency and spillover effects among neighboring countries. We find the following: (1) Evidence of spatial correlations in income inequality across countries. (2) A positive direct effect between innovation and inequality but a positive feedback from innovation. (3) The relationship between entrepreneurial activity and inequality is mixed. The relationship is positive if entrepreneurial activity is proxied by self-employment but negative if measured by entry rate. Both produced a negative feedback effect, which suggests that entrepreneurial activity is linked to rising inequality in developing countries. (4) A positive spillover effect from innovation and negative spillover effect from self-employment. We also investigated whether the linkages between innovation–inequality and entrepreneurial activity–inequality are subject to a country-level institutional quality. The findings suggest that the interaction terms have negative effects on income inequality. For policy implications, innovation sharing should be encouraged to reduce monopoly power that increases the tendency for wealth accumulation. Another possible solution to increase entrepreneurial activities while reducing inequality is for governments in developing countries to offer various schemes targeted at the poor, especially finance.
2021
https://rsaiconnect.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/rsp3.12470
developing economies, entrepreneurial activity, income inequality, innovation, microeconomics, spatial regression
Asamoah, Lawrence Adu; Figari, Francesco; Vezzulli, Andrea
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Asamoah_et_al_2021.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.19 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.19 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11383/2118104
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact