The two databases here described were generated to evaluate the role of affective content while assessing image quality (Corchs et al., 2018) [1]. The databases are composed of images JPEG-compressed together with the subjective quality scores collected during psychophysical experiments. To reduce interferences in quality perception due to image semantic, we have restricted the semantic content, choosing only close-ups of face images, and we have considered only two emotion categories (happy and sad). We have selected 23 images with happy faces and 23 images with sad faces of high quality. For what concerns image quality we have considered JPEG-distortion with 4 levels of compression, corresponding to q-factors 10, 15, 20, 30. The first image database, hereafter called MMSP-FaceA, is thus composed of 230 images (23+23) × 5 quality levels (including the original high quality pristine images). To better consider only interferences in quality perception due to affective content, we have generated a second image database where the background of images belonging to MMSP-FaceA has been cut off. This second image database is labelled as MMSP-FaceB. Psychophysical experiments were conducted, on a controlled web-based interface, where participants rated the image quality of the two databases in a five point scale. The two final databases MMSP-FaceA and MMSP-FaceB are thus composed of 230 images each, together with the raw quality scores assigned by the observers, and are available at our laboratory web site: www.mmsp.unimib.it/download.

Databases for evaluating interferences between affective content and image quality

Corchs, SE
2019-01-01

Abstract

The two databases here described were generated to evaluate the role of affective content while assessing image quality (Corchs et al., 2018) [1]. The databases are composed of images JPEG-compressed together with the subjective quality scores collected during psychophysical experiments. To reduce interferences in quality perception due to image semantic, we have restricted the semantic content, choosing only close-ups of face images, and we have considered only two emotion categories (happy and sad). We have selected 23 images with happy faces and 23 images with sad faces of high quality. For what concerns image quality we have considered JPEG-distortion with 4 levels of compression, corresponding to q-factors 10, 15, 20, 30. The first image database, hereafter called MMSP-FaceA, is thus composed of 230 images (23+23) × 5 quality levels (including the original high quality pristine images). To better consider only interferences in quality perception due to affective content, we have generated a second image database where the background of images belonging to MMSP-FaceA has been cut off. This second image database is labelled as MMSP-FaceB. Psychophysical experiments were conducted, on a controlled web-based interface, where participants rated the image quality of the two databases in a five point scale. The two final databases MMSP-FaceA and MMSP-FaceB are thus composed of 230 images each, together with the raw quality scores assigned by the observers, and are available at our laboratory web site: www.mmsp.unimib.it/download.
2019
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340919300496?via=ihub
Image quality; affective content; database
Gasparini, F; Ciocca, G; Corchs, Se
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11383/2127871
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact