The article intends to analyse the problem of the coexistence of opposite and alternative “comprehensive doctrines” in today's Western society, on the basis of a comparison between the thought of Schmitt, Böckenförde, Habermas, Rawls and Charles Taylor. In this regard the article proposes a possible solution to avoid, on the one hand, the intolerant goal of a total homogeneity, and on the other a naive and aproblematic acceptance of a relativistic multiculturalism.
Culture in conflitto e convivenza possibile
Francesco Bertoldi
2020-01-01
Abstract
The article intends to analyse the problem of the coexistence of opposite and alternative “comprehensive doctrines” in today's Western society, on the basis of a comparison between the thought of Schmitt, Böckenförde, Habermas, Rawls and Charles Taylor. In this regard the article proposes a possible solution to avoid, on the one hand, the intolerant goal of a total homogeneity, and on the other a naive and aproblematic acceptance of a relativistic multiculturalism.
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Bertoldi [2020] Culture in conflitto e convivenza possibile - Metabasis nov.2020.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: articolo
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
723.94 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
723.94 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
