The essay proposes a study of a selection of the most popular forms of government from the perspective of the funding gap in the public budget process. A distinction between an assembly-dominated model and an executive-dominated model is proposed, which may be useful for a deeper understanding of the functioning of the forms of government. Finally, the analysis offers some useful insights into the relationship between budgetary decision making and the real state of democracy in a country.

Funding gap and "budget-oriented classification" of forms of government

Luigi Testa
2020-01-01

Abstract

The essay proposes a study of a selection of the most popular forms of government from the perspective of the funding gap in the public budget process. A distinction between an assembly-dominated model and an executive-dominated model is proposed, which may be useful for a deeper understanding of the functioning of the forms of government. Finally, the analysis offers some useful insights into the relationship between budgetary decision making and the real state of democracy in a country.
2020
2020
democracy; forms of government; budget; Parliament
Testa, Luigi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
217-740-1-PB.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo in rivista
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 927.26 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
927.26 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11383/2138051
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact