Introduction: Depression is a common illness worldwide and can severely interfere with daily and work functioning. Both pharmacological and psychotherapeutics interventions are used for adult depression. The aim of the review is to evaluate the efficacy of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (STPP) comparing with different types of intervention. Materials and methods: A systematic review with meta-analysis on the efficacy of STPP in depressive disorders was conducted. Results: Meta-analysis results confirm the superiority of STPP versus no interventions. The average effect size of depressive symptoms severity at the end of the treatment is -0.91 (95 % CI: -1.49 - -0.33) in favor of STPP, while for clinical improvement of depressive symptoms is -0.78 (95 % CI: -1.56 - 0.01). Results confirm a net superiority of STPP to usual treatments unstructured. A mild superiority of efficacy of STPP on support psychotherapy emerged. Comparison of the efficacy of STPP vs cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy (CBT) shows little superior in case of STPP. No substantial differences in efficacy in case of STPP than control interventions emerged. Antidepressant pharmacotherapy is resulted to be slightly more effective to STPP. Discussion: While all the other results confirm current literature, this review shows no superiority of combined treatment than STPP only. Limitations: The review has some limitations such as the lack of moderation analysis and the high heterogenicity of the type of the studies. Conclusions: The results confirm the efficacy of STPP in depressive disorders endorsing the guidelines of National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.

Efficacy of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (STPP) in depressive disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Caselli, Ivano
Primo
Writing – Review & Editing
;
Ielmini, Marta
Secondo
Conceptualization
;
Zizolfi, Daniele
Investigation
;
Callegari, Camilla
Supervision
2023-01-01

Abstract

Introduction: Depression is a common illness worldwide and can severely interfere with daily and work functioning. Both pharmacological and psychotherapeutics interventions are used for adult depression. The aim of the review is to evaluate the efficacy of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (STPP) comparing with different types of intervention. Materials and methods: A systematic review with meta-analysis on the efficacy of STPP in depressive disorders was conducted. Results: Meta-analysis results confirm the superiority of STPP versus no interventions. The average effect size of depressive symptoms severity at the end of the treatment is -0.91 (95 % CI: -1.49 - -0.33) in favor of STPP, while for clinical improvement of depressive symptoms is -0.78 (95 % CI: -1.56 - 0.01). Results confirm a net superiority of STPP to usual treatments unstructured. A mild superiority of efficacy of STPP on support psychotherapy emerged. Comparison of the efficacy of STPP vs cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy (CBT) shows little superior in case of STPP. No substantial differences in efficacy in case of STPP than control interventions emerged. Antidepressant pharmacotherapy is resulted to be slightly more effective to STPP. Discussion: While all the other results confirm current literature, this review shows no superiority of combined treatment than STPP only. Limitations: The review has some limitations such as the lack of moderation analysis and the high heterogenicity of the type of the studies. Conclusions: The results confirm the efficacy of STPP in depressive disorders endorsing the guidelines of National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.
2023
2023
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2022.12.161
Depression; Depressive disorders; Short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy; Systematic review; meta-analysis
Caselli, Ivano; Ielmini, Marta; Bellini, Alessandro; Zizolfi, Daniele; Callegari, Camilla
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-s016503272201521x-main published.pdf

non disponibili

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 1.36 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.36 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11383/2145772
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact