Background: Groin hernia management has a significant worldwide diversity with multiple surgical techniques and variable outcomes. The International guidelines for groin hernia management serve to help in groin hernia management, but the acceptance among general surgeons remains unknown. The aim of our study was to gauge the degree of agreement with the guidelines among health care professionals worldwide. Methods: Forty-six key statements and recommendations of the International guidelines for groin hernia management were selected and presented at plenary consensus conferences at four international congresses in Europe, the America’s and Asia. Participants could cast their votes through live voting. Additionally, a web survey was sent out to all society members allowing online voting after each congress. Consensus was defined as > 70% agreement among all participants. Results: In total 822 surgeons cast their vote on the key statements and recommendations during the four plenary consensus meetings or via the web survey. Consensus was reached on 34 out of 39 (87%) recommendations, and on six out of seven (86%) statements. No consensus was reached on the use of light versus heavy-weight meshes (69%), superior cost-effectiveness of day-case laparo-endoscopic repair (69%), omitting prophylactic antibiotics in hernia repair, general or local versus regional anesthesia in elderly patients (55%) and re-operation in case of immediate postoperative pain (59%). Conclusion: Globally, there is 87% consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of groin hernias. This provides a solid basis for standardizing the care path of patients with groin hernias.

Consensus on international guidelines for management of groin hernias

Campanelli G.;
2020-01-01

Abstract

Background: Groin hernia management has a significant worldwide diversity with multiple surgical techniques and variable outcomes. The International guidelines for groin hernia management serve to help in groin hernia management, but the acceptance among general surgeons remains unknown. The aim of our study was to gauge the degree of agreement with the guidelines among health care professionals worldwide. Methods: Forty-six key statements and recommendations of the International guidelines for groin hernia management were selected and presented at plenary consensus conferences at four international congresses in Europe, the America’s and Asia. Participants could cast their votes through live voting. Additionally, a web survey was sent out to all society members allowing online voting after each congress. Consensus was defined as > 70% agreement among all participants. Results: In total 822 surgeons cast their vote on the key statements and recommendations during the four plenary consensus meetings or via the web survey. Consensus was reached on 34 out of 39 (87%) recommendations, and on six out of seven (86%) statements. No consensus was reached on the use of light versus heavy-weight meshes (69%), superior cost-effectiveness of day-case laparo-endoscopic repair (69%), omitting prophylactic antibiotics in hernia repair, general or local versus regional anesthesia in elderly patients (55%) and re-operation in case of immediate postoperative pain (59%). Conclusion: Globally, there is 87% consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of groin hernias. This provides a solid basis for standardizing the care path of patients with groin hernias.
2020
2020
Consensus conferences; Inguinal hernias; International guidelines; Consensus; Groin; Hernia, Femoral; Hernia, Inguinal; Herniorrhaphy; Humans; Practice Guidelines as Topic
van Veenendaal, N.; Simons, M.; Hope, W.; Tumtavitikul, S.; Bonjer, J.; Aufenacker, T.; Berrevoet, F.; Bingener, J.; Bisgaard, T.; Bittner, R.; Bury, K.; Campanelli, G.; Chen, D.; Chowbey, P.; Conze, J.; Cuccurullo, D.; De Beaux, A.; Eker, H.; Fitzgibbons, R.; Fortelny, R.; Gillion, J. F.; Van den Heuvel, B.; Jorgensen, L.; Klinge, U.; Kockerling, F.; Kukleta, J.; Konate, I.; Liem, L.; Lomanto, D.; Loos, M.; Lopez-Cano, M.; Miserez, M.; Misra, M.; Montgomery, A.; Morales-Conde, S.; Muysoms, F.; Niebuhr, H.; Nordin, P.; Pawlak, M.; Van Ramshorst, G.; Reinpold, W.; Sanders, D.; Sani, R.; Schouten, N.; Smedberg, S.; Smietanski, M.; Simmermacher, R.; Tran, H.; Wijsmuller, A.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Consensus-on-international-guidelines-for-management-of-groin-herniasSurgical-Endoscopy.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 4.3 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.3 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11383/2151271
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 14
  • Scopus 42
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 35
social impact