Different methods are available in clinical ethics consultation. In our experience as ethics consultants, certain individual methods have proven insufficient, and so we use a combination of methods. Based on these considerations, we first critically analyze the pros and cons of two well-known methods in the working field of clinical ethics, namely Beauchamp and Childress's four-principle approach and Jonsen, Siegler, and Winslade's four-box method. We then present the circle method, which we have used and refined during several clinical ethics consultations in the hospital setting.

The Circle Method: A Novel Approach to Clinical Ethics Consultation

Nicoli, Federico
;
Grossi, Alessandra Agnese;Testa, Jacopo;Picozzi, Mario
2023-01-01

Abstract

Different methods are available in clinical ethics consultation. In our experience as ethics consultants, certain individual methods have proven insufficient, and so we use a combination of methods. Based on these considerations, we first critically analyze the pros and cons of two well-known methods in the working field of clinical ethics, namely Beauchamp and Childress's four-principle approach and Jonsen, Siegler, and Winslade's four-box method. We then present the circle method, which we have used and refined during several clinical ethics consultations in the hospital setting.
2023
2023
Ethical Theory; Ethicists; Ethics Consultation; Ethics, Clinical; Ethics, Medical; Humans
Nicoli, Federico; Grossi, Alessandra Agnese; Testa, Jacopo; Picozzi, Mario
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
19. NICOLI et al. (2023)_The circle method.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 216.16 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
216.16 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11383/2154673
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact