Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions represent one of the main drawbacks of wastewater (WW) treatment. However, results of a detailed estimation of the emissions can be a valid tool to define optimal solutions for minimizing impact of WW treatment system on the environment. Thermophilic biological fluidized bed reactor (TBFBR) has been recently proposed as an alternative solution for biological sludge minimization in wastewater treatment plant (WWTPs). In this work, 5 diverse scenarios of sludge line composition were studied and combined with 5 diverse sludge disposal options. GHG emissions in 25 combinations were fully investigated to define optimal sludge treatment and disposal option. Results suggested that TBFBR help to reduce net emitted GHGs with respect to scenario with conventional stabilization treatment in sludge line (anaerobic digestion) (−32.3 ± 3.55 %) thanks to (i) the reuse in water line of the aqueous residue of TBFBR as alternative carbon source, (ii) the significant minimization of sludge production, and (iii) the contained impact of gross GHG emissions due to the energy consumption of this process. The strong minimization of sludge also led to a decisive reduction in GHG emissions in the subsequent phases of transport, additional treatments, and final disposal making the choice of the disposal option indifferent on the overall GHG emission estimation. Moreover, the coupling of processes for the simultaneous and preventive maximization of energy recovery (TCH, and AnaD) before sludge minimization in TBFBR determined a limited reduction of GHG emission compared to scenario with TBFBR alone (−3.71 ± 1.47 %).

Thermophilic biological fluidized bed reactor in sludge line reduces greenhouse gas emissions in wastewater treatment system

Carnevale Miino M.
2022-01-01

Abstract

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions represent one of the main drawbacks of wastewater (WW) treatment. However, results of a detailed estimation of the emissions can be a valid tool to define optimal solutions for minimizing impact of WW treatment system on the environment. Thermophilic biological fluidized bed reactor (TBFBR) has been recently proposed as an alternative solution for biological sludge minimization in wastewater treatment plant (WWTPs). In this work, 5 diverse scenarios of sludge line composition were studied and combined with 5 diverse sludge disposal options. GHG emissions in 25 combinations were fully investigated to define optimal sludge treatment and disposal option. Results suggested that TBFBR help to reduce net emitted GHGs with respect to scenario with conventional stabilization treatment in sludge line (anaerobic digestion) (−32.3 ± 3.55 %) thanks to (i) the reuse in water line of the aqueous residue of TBFBR as alternative carbon source, (ii) the significant minimization of sludge production, and (iii) the contained impact of gross GHG emissions due to the energy consumption of this process. The strong minimization of sludge also led to a decisive reduction in GHG emissions in the subsequent phases of transport, additional treatments, and final disposal making the choice of the disposal option indifferent on the overall GHG emission estimation. Moreover, the coupling of processes for the simultaneous and preventive maximization of energy recovery (TCH, and AnaD) before sludge minimization in TBFBR determined a limited reduction of GHG emission compared to scenario with TBFBR alone (−3.71 ± 1.47 %).
2022
2022
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157794
GHG; Carbon footprint; Wastewater treatment; Sludge reuse; Air emissions; WWTP
Collivignarelli, M. C.; Baldi, M.; Carnevale Miino, M.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Thermophilic biological fluidized bed reactor.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 2.52 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.52 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11383/2162313
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact