Background. Infection after total hip arthroplasty is a serious problem in terms of treatment, patients suffering and economic impact. In this paper the authors report the results achieved in the treatment of 16 cases of infections following a total hip replacement, both primary and revision are reported. Methods. The therapy consisted of a simple surgical toilette or a two stages revision or a resection-arthroplasty according to Girdlestone. The choice was done basically taking into consideration the type of infection and the microrganism involved, the extension of the pathologic process and finally the general condition and patient's life attendance. Results. The efficacy of the treatment used was judged on the basis of the normalisation of parameters such as ESR, CRP and the absence of radiographic findings suggesting a periprosthetic sepsis at the end of the systemic antibiotic administration and at the follow-up visits for an average follow-up of 30 months (range 12 to 48 months). Conclusions. An early and superficial infection may be successfully treated with an accurate surgical debridement, while the late onset and the deep localisation of the process may require a more invasive procedures as one or two stages revisions or a resection- arthroplasty according to Girgdlestone.

Personal experience in the treatment of infection following total hip arthroplasty

D'Angelo F.;Cherubino P.
1999-01-01

Abstract

Background. Infection after total hip arthroplasty is a serious problem in terms of treatment, patients suffering and economic impact. In this paper the authors report the results achieved in the treatment of 16 cases of infections following a total hip replacement, both primary and revision are reported. Methods. The therapy consisted of a simple surgical toilette or a two stages revision or a resection-arthroplasty according to Girdlestone. The choice was done basically taking into consideration the type of infection and the microrganism involved, the extension of the pathologic process and finally the general condition and patient's life attendance. Results. The efficacy of the treatment used was judged on the basis of the normalisation of parameters such as ESR, CRP and the absence of radiographic findings suggesting a periprosthetic sepsis at the end of the systemic antibiotic administration and at the follow-up visits for an average follow-up of 30 months (range 12 to 48 months). Conclusions. An early and superficial infection may be successfully treated with an accurate surgical debridement, while the late onset and the deep localisation of the process may require a more invasive procedures as one or two stages revisions or a resection- arthroplasty according to Girgdlestone.
1999
Arthroplasty; Hip adverse effects; MIP prosthesis adverse effects; Prosthesis related infections surgery; Replacement
D'Angelo, F.; Castelli, C. C.; Grassi, F. A.; Borromeo, U. M.; Cherubino, P.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11383/2164516
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact