The surgical management of apparent early-stage endometrial cancer is still unclear. Nodal involvement is prognostic, but the role of retroperitoneal staging is still debated. Sentinel node mapping has been introduced and accepted as a valid alternative to full lymphadenectomy. Furthermore, ultrastaging provides a more accurate analysis of the excised lymph nodes by detecting a higher rate of low-volume metastasis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of low-volume metastasis on recurrence-free survival in women with apparent early-stage endometrial cancer in a large retrospective multi-institutional collaboration.The aim of this study was to assess the impact of low-volume metastasis (LVM) on disease-free survival (DFS) in women with apparent early-stage endometrial cancer (EC) who underwent sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping. Patients with pre-operative early-stage EC were retrospectively collected from an international collaboration including 13 referring institutions. A total of 1428 patients were included in this analysis. One hundred and eighty-six patients (13%) had lymph node involvement. Fifty-nine percent of positive SLN exhibited micrometastases, 26.9% micrometastases, and 14% isolated tumor cells. Seventeen patients with positive lymph nodes did not receive any adjuvant therapy. At a median follow-up of 33.3 months, the disease had recurred in 114 women (8%). Patients with micrometastases in the lymph nodes had a worse prognosis of disease-free survival compared to patients with negative nodes or LVM. The rate of recurrence was significantly higher for women with micrometastases than those with low-volume metastases (HR = 2.61; p = 0.01). The administration of adjuvant treatment in patients with LVM, without uterine risk factors, remains a matter of debate and requires further evaluation.

The Risk of Recurrence in Endometrial Cancer Patients with Low-Volume Metastasis in the Sentinel Lymph Nodes: A Retrospective Multi-Institutional Study

Casarin J.;Ghezzi F.;
2023-01-01

Abstract

The surgical management of apparent early-stage endometrial cancer is still unclear. Nodal involvement is prognostic, but the role of retroperitoneal staging is still debated. Sentinel node mapping has been introduced and accepted as a valid alternative to full lymphadenectomy. Furthermore, ultrastaging provides a more accurate analysis of the excised lymph nodes by detecting a higher rate of low-volume metastasis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of low-volume metastasis on recurrence-free survival in women with apparent early-stage endometrial cancer in a large retrospective multi-institutional collaboration.The aim of this study was to assess the impact of low-volume metastasis (LVM) on disease-free survival (DFS) in women with apparent early-stage endometrial cancer (EC) who underwent sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping. Patients with pre-operative early-stage EC were retrospectively collected from an international collaboration including 13 referring institutions. A total of 1428 patients were included in this analysis. One hundred and eighty-six patients (13%) had lymph node involvement. Fifty-nine percent of positive SLN exhibited micrometastases, 26.9% micrometastases, and 14% isolated tumor cells. Seventeen patients with positive lymph nodes did not receive any adjuvant therapy. At a median follow-up of 33.3 months, the disease had recurred in 114 women (8%). Patients with micrometastases in the lymph nodes had a worse prognosis of disease-free survival compared to patients with negative nodes or LVM. The rate of recurrence was significantly higher for women with micrometastases than those with low-volume metastases (HR = 2.61; p = 0.01). The administration of adjuvant treatment in patients with LVM, without uterine risk factors, remains a matter of debate and requires further evaluation.
2023
endometrial cancer; low-volume metastasis; recurrence-free survival; sentinel lymph node biopsy; ultrastaging
Buda, A.; Paniga, C.; Taskin, S.; Mueller, M.; Zapardiel, I.; Fanfani, F.; Puppo, A.; Casarin, J.; Papadia, A.; De Ponti, E.; Grassi, T.; Mauro, J.; Turan, H.; Vatansever, D.; Gungor, M.; Ortag, F.; Imboden, S.; Garcia-Pineda, V.; Mohr, S.; Siegenthaler, F.; Perotto, S.; Landoni, F.; Ghezzi, F.; Scambia, G.; Taskiran, C.; Fruscio, R.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11383/2165212
 Attenzione

L'Ateneo sottopone a validazione solo i file PDF allegati

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact