Considerable similarities can be envisaged between civil and tax studies on the subjectivity, despite the different relationships and interests regulated. In tax matters, subjectivity can be conceived as a regulatory technique, functional to the determination of the subject matter which justifies the contribution of the taxpayers to public expenses. Taxable persons, however, must be distinguished from taxpayers: the former reflect the technical nature of tax law; the latter, its social and constitutional dimension. In this view, artificial intelligence cannot be regarded as a taxpayer itself, but the object of a tax that necessarily concerns its user.
Developments on tax subjectivy. The case for artificial intelligence. Sviluppi in tema di soggettività tributaria. Il caso dell'intelligenza artificiale
DANIELE CANE'
2023-01-01
Abstract
Considerable similarities can be envisaged between civil and tax studies on the subjectivity, despite the different relationships and interests regulated. In tax matters, subjectivity can be conceived as a regulatory technique, functional to the determination of the subject matter which justifies the contribution of the taxpayers to public expenses. Taxable persons, however, must be distinguished from taxpayers: the former reflect the technical nature of tax law; the latter, its social and constitutional dimension. In this view, artificial intelligence cannot be regarded as a taxpayer itself, but the object of a tax that necessarily concerns its user.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Canè_SVILUPPI IN TEMA DI SOGGETTIVITÀ TRIBUTARIA. IL CASO DELL’INTELLIGENZA ARTIFICIALE_AJI18_49.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
385.86 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
385.86 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.