Background: The TCGA molecular groups of endometrial carcinoma are “POLE-mutated” (POLEmut), “microsatellite-instable/mismatch repair-deficient” (MSI/MMRd), “TP53-mutated/p53-abnormal” (TP53mut/p53abn), and “no specific molecular profile” (NSMP). Objective: Prognostic assessment of the TCGA groups in uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS). Search strategy: Systematic review from January 2000 to January 2021. Selection criteria: Studies assessing the TCGA groups in UCS. Data collection and analysis: Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by Kaplan–Meier and Cox analyses (reference: TP53mut/p53abn group) and compared with endometrioid and serous carcinomas (original TCGA cohort), with a significant P < 0.050. Main results: Five studies with 263 UCS were included. Compared with TP53mut/p53abn UCS, MSI/MMRd UCS showed significantly better PFS (P < 0.001) but similar OS (P = 0.788), whereas NSMP UCS showed similar PFS (P = 0.936) and OS (P = 0.240). Compared with their endometrioid/serous counterparts, NSMP and TP53mut/p53abn UCS showed significantly worse PFS (P < 0.001 and P = 0.004) and OS (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001), while MSI/MMRd UCS showed similar PFS (P = 0.595) but significantly worse OS (P < 0.001). The POLEmut group showed neither recurrences nor deaths in both the UCS and the endometrioid/serous carcinoma cohorts. Conclusion: POLEmut UCS show excellent prognosis, whereas TP53mut/p53abn and NSMP UCS show a prognosis even worse than that of TP53mut/p53abn endometrioid/serous carcinomas. The prognosis of MSI/MMRd UCS remains to be defined.

Prognostic value of the TCGA molecular classification in uterine carcinosarcoma

Travaglino A;
2021-01-01

Abstract

Background: The TCGA molecular groups of endometrial carcinoma are “POLE-mutated” (POLEmut), “microsatellite-instable/mismatch repair-deficient” (MSI/MMRd), “TP53-mutated/p53-abnormal” (TP53mut/p53abn), and “no specific molecular profile” (NSMP). Objective: Prognostic assessment of the TCGA groups in uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS). Search strategy: Systematic review from January 2000 to January 2021. Selection criteria: Studies assessing the TCGA groups in UCS. Data collection and analysis: Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by Kaplan–Meier and Cox analyses (reference: TP53mut/p53abn group) and compared with endometrioid and serous carcinomas (original TCGA cohort), with a significant P < 0.050. Main results: Five studies with 263 UCS were included. Compared with TP53mut/p53abn UCS, MSI/MMRd UCS showed significantly better PFS (P < 0.001) but similar OS (P = 0.788), whereas NSMP UCS showed similar PFS (P = 0.936) and OS (P = 0.240). Compared with their endometrioid/serous counterparts, NSMP and TP53mut/p53abn UCS showed significantly worse PFS (P < 0.001 and P = 0.004) and OS (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001), while MSI/MMRd UCS showed similar PFS (P = 0.595) but significantly worse OS (P < 0.001). The POLEmut group showed neither recurrences nor deaths in both the UCS and the endometrioid/serous carcinoma cohorts. Conclusion: POLEmut UCS show excellent prognosis, whereas TP53mut/p53abn and NSMP UCS show a prognosis even worse than that of TP53mut/p53abn endometrioid/serous carcinomas. The prognosis of MSI/MMRd UCS remains to be defined.
2021
2021
cancer; endoscopic surgery; gyne-oncology; laparoscopy; mortality
Travaglino, A; Raffone, A; Raimondo, D; Arciuolo, D; Angelico, G; Valente, M; Scaglione, G; D'Alessandris, N; Casadio, P; Inzani, F; Mollo, A; Santoro, A; Seracchioli, R; Franco Zannoni, G.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Intl J Gynecology Obste - 2021 - Travaglino - Prognostic value of the TCGA molecular classification in uterine.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.38 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.38 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11383/2166220
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 8
  • Scopus 18
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 18
social impact