In TheAuthoress of the Odyssey (1897), Samuel Butler developed a notably controversial intuition about the poem's author. In his analyses, he concluded that the same person could not have created the Iliad and the Odyssey: whilst the former was undoubtedly written by the Greek male poet Homer, the latter should be regarded as a companion piece to the Iliad and was instead the work of a <> woman (as the title to his chapter VII phrases it) from Magna Graecia, more precisely Trapani, Sicily. This theory rested upon his assumption that female characters in the Odyssey are favourably portrayed, whereas there is a relative disregard for male characters (Ebbott 2005). Butler's prose translations of the Iliad and the Odyssey became highly successful and are still consulted nowadays; however, his views on the authorship of Homer's works were severely criticised back then. The purpose of this paper is to explore to what extent Butler's theory impacted his translation of the Odyssey by analysing his portrayal of female characters through collocations (<< word sketches>>); to this end, an approach combining corpus linguistics (Fischer-Starcke 2010), corpus stylistics (Mahlberg 2012), and translational stylistics (Boase-Beier 2006) will be adopted as the research design for this study. This study analyses the target text to understand how gender is represented and received (Venuti 2019) through linguistic choices.

The representation of female characters in Butler’s translation of the “Odyssey”: a corpus-based approach

Russo, Daniel
2024-01-01

Abstract

In TheAuthoress of the Odyssey (1897), Samuel Butler developed a notably controversial intuition about the poem's author. In his analyses, he concluded that the same person could not have created the Iliad and the Odyssey: whilst the former was undoubtedly written by the Greek male poet Homer, the latter should be regarded as a companion piece to the Iliad and was instead the work of a <> woman (as the title to his chapter VII phrases it) from Magna Graecia, more precisely Trapani, Sicily. This theory rested upon his assumption that female characters in the Odyssey are favourably portrayed, whereas there is a relative disregard for male characters (Ebbott 2005). Butler's prose translations of the Iliad and the Odyssey became highly successful and are still consulted nowadays; however, his views on the authorship of Homer's works were severely criticised back then. The purpose of this paper is to explore to what extent Butler's theory impacted his translation of the Odyssey by analysing his portrayal of female characters through collocations (<< word sketches>>); to this end, an approach combining corpus linguistics (Fischer-Starcke 2010), corpus stylistics (Mahlberg 2012), and translational stylistics (Boase-Beier 2006) will be adopted as the research design for this study. This study analyses the target text to understand how gender is represented and received (Venuti 2019) through linguistic choices.
2024
2024
Odyssey; Butler; corpus stylistics; translation; gender representation
Russo, Daniel
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11383/2186991
 Attenzione

L'Ateneo sottopone a validazione solo i file PDF allegati

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact