OBJECTIVES: To analyze how the experience of the surgical team went to impact the outcomes after open surgical repair (OSR) of intact abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). METHODS: This is a single-center, observational cohort study with retrospective analysis of all OR for intact AAA performed between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2022. The primary outcome was survival at 30 days and in follow-up, and a composite outcome of mortality and major complication. The secondary outcome was freedom from aorta-related reintervention. All outcomes were stratified according to the experience of the operating team (surgeons and anesthesiology). RESULTS: We analyzed 103 (7.2%) patients: 97 (94.2%) males and 6 (5.8%) females. The mean age was 76 ± 8 years (range, 55–93). The best possible team composition was present in 52 (50.5%) interventions. The follow-up index was 0.82 ± 0.18 (range, 0.6–1.0). Mean follow-up duration was 59 ± 43 months (range, 0–158). We observed no differences between teams in major complications (best, 17.3% vs mixed, 21.6%; OR: 0.4, P ¼ 0.622), 30 days mortality (best, 0% vs mixed, 5.9%; OR: 7.6, P ¼ 0.118) and composite outcome (best, 11.5% vs mixed, 17.6%; OR: 0.8, P ¼ 0.416). Cox regression analysis identified the best possible team as a protective factor against the need for reintervention (hazard ratio: 0.2; 95% confidence interval: 0.06–0.88, P ¼ 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, OR of AAA yielded satisfactory results in terms of safety and efficacy independently of the team’s experience. A more experienced team may protect against aorta-related reintervention.
Outcome analysis of the surgical team in open surgical repair of intact abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery
Piffaretti G.
;Zammito A.;Tozzi M.;
2024-01-01
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To analyze how the experience of the surgical team went to impact the outcomes after open surgical repair (OSR) of intact abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). METHODS: This is a single-center, observational cohort study with retrospective analysis of all OR for intact AAA performed between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2022. The primary outcome was survival at 30 days and in follow-up, and a composite outcome of mortality and major complication. The secondary outcome was freedom from aorta-related reintervention. All outcomes were stratified according to the experience of the operating team (surgeons and anesthesiology). RESULTS: We analyzed 103 (7.2%) patients: 97 (94.2%) males and 6 (5.8%) females. The mean age was 76 ± 8 years (range, 55–93). The best possible team composition was present in 52 (50.5%) interventions. The follow-up index was 0.82 ± 0.18 (range, 0.6–1.0). Mean follow-up duration was 59 ± 43 months (range, 0–158). We observed no differences between teams in major complications (best, 17.3% vs mixed, 21.6%; OR: 0.4, P ¼ 0.622), 30 days mortality (best, 0% vs mixed, 5.9%; OR: 7.6, P ¼ 0.118) and composite outcome (best, 11.5% vs mixed, 17.6%; OR: 0.8, P ¼ 0.416). Cox regression analysis identified the best possible team as a protective factor against the need for reintervention (hazard ratio: 0.2; 95% confidence interval: 0.06–0.88, P ¼ 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, OR of AAA yielded satisfactory results in terms of safety and efficacy independently of the team’s experience. A more experienced team may protect against aorta-related reintervention.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
ezae319.pdf
non disponibili
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
1.84 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.84 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.