Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) carries a high risk of severe hemorrhage and potential loss of fertility. This narrative review summarizes current evidence on uterine artery embolization (UAE) using absorbable gelatin sponge (GS), focusing on GS preparation, procedural approaches, and reported outcomes. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched from January 2015 to 31 December 2024 for peer-reviewed studies reporting UAE with GS for CSP (GS alone or combined with intra-arterial methotrexate and/or adjunct particles). Fifty studies (N = 3139) were included. Technical success was 3133/3139 (~99.8%) and clinical success was 2975/3139 (~94.8%), with most cohorts reporting high clinical control. Severe complications were infrequently reported (typically ~2–4% in most series). Menstrual function, when assessed, generally recovered within ~1–2 months. Subsequent pregnancy outcomes were inconsistently reported and follow-up durations were heterogeneous, predominantly in retrospective designs. Overall, UAE with GS appears effective for hemostasis in CSP and may reduce escalation to hysterectomy in appropriately selected patients. Standardized reporting of GS preparation and outcomes, as well as prospective multicenter registries/studies, are needed to refine best practices.
Transcatheter Arterial Embolization (TAE) of Uterine Artery with Gelatin Sponge for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Current State of the Art Review
Venturini M.;Fontana F.;Piacentino F.;Coppola A.;
2026-01-01
Abstract
Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) carries a high risk of severe hemorrhage and potential loss of fertility. This narrative review summarizes current evidence on uterine artery embolization (UAE) using absorbable gelatin sponge (GS), focusing on GS preparation, procedural approaches, and reported outcomes. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched from January 2015 to 31 December 2024 for peer-reviewed studies reporting UAE with GS for CSP (GS alone or combined with intra-arterial methotrexate and/or adjunct particles). Fifty studies (N = 3139) were included. Technical success was 3133/3139 (~99.8%) and clinical success was 2975/3139 (~94.8%), with most cohorts reporting high clinical control. Severe complications were infrequently reported (typically ~2–4% in most series). Menstrual function, when assessed, generally recovered within ~1–2 months. Subsequent pregnancy outcomes were inconsistently reported and follow-up durations were heterogeneous, predominantly in retrospective designs. Overall, UAE with GS appears effective for hemostasis in CSP and may reduce escalation to hysterectomy in appropriately selected patients. Standardized reporting of GS preparation and outcomes, as well as prospective multicenter registries/studies, are needed to refine best practices.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
gels-12-00044.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
1.85 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.85 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



