Background/Objectives: Wrist cock-up orthoses are standard for work-related muscu- loskeletal disorders, yet consensus is lacking on whether commercial orthoses (COs) or custom-made thermoplastic orthoses (THs) better preserve function. While COs offer availability, THs provide a superior anatomical fit. This study evaluated dexterity and satisfaction in healthy female employees to establish a functional baseline for preventive strategies. Methods: Healthy female office workers with no prior musculoskeletal or neuro- logical conditions participated in this randomized cross-over study. Manual dexterity was assessed at baseline and after each of two consecutive workdays, during which participants wore, in a randomized order, either a CO or a TH made by an expert physiotherapist. Outcome measures included the Functional Dexterity Test (FDT), recording time and errors, and the Client Satisfaction with Device (CSD-It) scale. Results: Twenty right-handed women (mean age 45.6 ± 11 years) participated. A significant difference in FDT completion times across conditions (χ2 = 12.6, p = 0.002) was found. While both orthoses slowed performance compared to baseline (p < 0.01), the CO allowed for faster dexterity than the TH (p < 0.01). No differences were found in error rates. Regarding satisfaction, the CO achieved significantly better CSD-It scores than the TH (p = 0.0047), despite 60% of users reporting increased skin temperature with the CO. Final preferences were nearly evenly split (55% CO vs. 45% TH). Conclusions: Both orthoses impact manual dexterity without compromising precision. While the CO offered better execution speed and overall satis- faction, the TH version was preferred for prolonged skin tolerability. Selection should be individualized, balancing mechanical efficiency with the superior fit of custom-fabricated solutions in office environments.

Commercial Versus Custom-Made Cock-Up Orthoses: A Randomized Cross-Over Analysis of Dexterity and Satisfaction in Female Office Employees.

Sartorio F;Godi M;
2026-01-01

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Wrist cock-up orthoses are standard for work-related muscu- loskeletal disorders, yet consensus is lacking on whether commercial orthoses (COs) or custom-made thermoplastic orthoses (THs) better preserve function. While COs offer availability, THs provide a superior anatomical fit. This study evaluated dexterity and satisfaction in healthy female employees to establish a functional baseline for preventive strategies. Methods: Healthy female office workers with no prior musculoskeletal or neuro- logical conditions participated in this randomized cross-over study. Manual dexterity was assessed at baseline and after each of two consecutive workdays, during which participants wore, in a randomized order, either a CO or a TH made by an expert physiotherapist. Outcome measures included the Functional Dexterity Test (FDT), recording time and errors, and the Client Satisfaction with Device (CSD-It) scale. Results: Twenty right-handed women (mean age 45.6 ± 11 years) participated. A significant difference in FDT completion times across conditions (χ2 = 12.6, p = 0.002) was found. While both orthoses slowed performance compared to baseline (p < 0.01), the CO allowed for faster dexterity than the TH (p < 0.01). No differences were found in error rates. Regarding satisfaction, the CO achieved significantly better CSD-It scores than the TH (p = 0.0047), despite 60% of users reporting increased skin temperature with the CO. Final preferences were nearly evenly split (55% CO vs. 45% TH). Conclusions: Both orthoses impact manual dexterity without compromising precision. While the CO offered better execution speed and overall satis- faction, the TH version was preferred for prolonged skin tolerability. Selection should be individualized, balancing mechanical efficiency with the superior fit of custom-fabricated solutions in office environments.
2026
2026
rehabilitation; orthosis; hand therapy; physical therapy; occupational therapy; work; manual dexterity
Sartorio, F; Giardini, M; Libiani, G; Arcolin, I; Godi, M; And Stefano, Corna
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11383/2216511
 Attenzione

L'Ateneo sottopone a validazione solo i file PDF allegati

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact