Studying how individuals compare two given quantitative stimuli, say d(1) and d(2), is a fundamental problem. One very common way to address it is through ratio estimation, that is to ask individuals not to give values to d(1) and d(2), but rather to give their estimates of the ratio p = d(1)/d(2). Several psychophysical theories (the best known being Stevens' power-law) claim that this ratio cannot be known directly and that there are cognitive distortions on the apprehension of the different quantities. These theories result in the so-called separable representations [Luce, R. D. (2002). A psychophysical theory of intensity proportions, joint presentations, and matches. Psychological Review, 109, 520-532; Narens, L. (1996). A theory of ratio magnitude estimation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 40, 109-788], which include Stevens' model as a special case. In this paper we propose a general statistical framework that allows for testing in a rigorous way whether the separable representation theory is grounded or not. We conclude in favor of it, but reject Stevens' model. As a byproduct, we provide estimates of the psychophysical functions of interest.

Measurement by Subjective Estimation: Testing for Separable Representations

SERI, RAFFAELLO
2008-01-01

Abstract

Studying how individuals compare two given quantitative stimuli, say d(1) and d(2), is a fundamental problem. One very common way to address it is through ratio estimation, that is to ask individuals not to give values to d(1) and d(2), but rather to give their estimates of the ratio p = d(1)/d(2). Several psychophysical theories (the best known being Stevens' power-law) claim that this ratio cannot be known directly and that there are cognitive distortions on the apprehension of the different quantities. These theories result in the so-called separable representations [Luce, R. D. (2002). A psychophysical theory of intensity proportions, joint presentations, and matches. Psychological Review, 109, 520-532; Narens, L. (1996). A theory of ratio magnitude estimation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 40, 109-788], which include Stevens' model as a special case. In this paper we propose a general statistical framework that allows for testing in a rigorous way whether the separable representation theory is grounded or not. We conclude in favor of it, but reject Stevens' model. As a byproduct, we provide estimates of the psychophysical functions of interest.
2008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2008.01.002
Separable representations; Stevens' model; Psychophysical experiments
Bernasconi, M.; Choirat, C.; Seri, Raffaello
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11383/5272
 Attenzione

L'Ateneo sottopone a validazione solo i file PDF allegati

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
social impact