A number of measures have been defined in ESE by using weighted sums. For instance, several widely used functionality measures and quality models are defined by using weighted sums. Despite the apparent simplicity in the definition and in the interpretation of those measures, there are a few inherent problems that may make them quite problematic. This paper provides a critical investigation about the theoretical and empirical validation pitfalls of weighted sums that may make them unsuitable for the definition of meaningful and practically useful measures.
On the use of weighted sums in the definition of measures
MORASCA, SANDRO
2010-01-01
Abstract
A number of measures have been defined in ESE by using weighted sums. For instance, several widely used functionality measures and quality models are defined by using weighted sums. Despite the apparent simplicity in the definition and in the interpretation of those measures, there are a few inherent problems that may make them quite problematic. This paper provides a critical investigation about the theoretical and empirical validation pitfalls of weighted sums that may make them unsuitable for the definition of meaningful and practically useful measures.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
WETSOM2010Morasca.PDF
non disponibili
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print
Licenza:
DRM non definito
Dimensione
216.62 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
216.62 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.