An experimental probabilistic approach for health risk assessment was applied for graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs). The hazard assessment indicated a low level of toxicity for the GNPs. The benchmark dose method, based on sub-chronic and chronic inhalation exposure studies, was used to quantify a guidance value (BMCh) for occupational inhalation exposure to GNPs, expressed as a lognormal distribution with a geometric mean ± geometric standard deviation of 0.212 ± 7.79 mg/m3 and 9.37 × 104 ± 7.6 particle/cm3. Exposure scenarios (ES) were defined based on the scientific literature for large-scale production (ES1) and manufacturing (ES2) of GNPs; a third ES, concerning in-lab handling of GNPs (ES3) was based on results of experiments performed for this study. A probability distribution function was then assumed for each ES. The risk magnitude was calculated using a risk characterization ratio (RCR), defined as the ratio of the exposure distributions and the BMCh distribution. All three ES resulted in RCR distributions ≥1 (i.e. risk present); however, none of the ES had a statistically significant level of risk at a 95% confidence interval. A sensitivity analysis indicated that ∼75% of the variation in the RCR distributions was due to uncertainties in the BMCh calculation.

Probabilistic approach for the risk assessment of nanomaterials: a case study for graphene nanoplatelets

Spinazzè, A.
;
Cattaneo, A.;Borghi, F.;Campagnolo, D.;Rovelli, S.;Cavallo, D.
2019-01-01

Abstract

An experimental probabilistic approach for health risk assessment was applied for graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs). The hazard assessment indicated a low level of toxicity for the GNPs. The benchmark dose method, based on sub-chronic and chronic inhalation exposure studies, was used to quantify a guidance value (BMCh) for occupational inhalation exposure to GNPs, expressed as a lognormal distribution with a geometric mean ± geometric standard deviation of 0.212 ± 7.79 mg/m3 and 9.37 × 104 ± 7.6 particle/cm3. Exposure scenarios (ES) were defined based on the scientific literature for large-scale production (ES1) and manufacturing (ES2) of GNPs; a third ES, concerning in-lab handling of GNPs (ES3) was based on results of experiments performed for this study. A probability distribution function was then assumed for each ES. The risk magnitude was calculated using a risk characterization ratio (RCR), defined as the ratio of the exposure distributions and the BMCh distribution. All three ES resulted in RCR distributions ≥1 (i.e. risk present); however, none of the ES had a statistically significant level of risk at a 95% confidence interval. A sensitivity analysis indicated that ∼75% of the variation in the RCR distributions was due to uncertainties in the BMCh calculation.
2019
www.urbanfischer.de/journals/intjhyg
Occupational exposure Engineered nanomaterials Graphene Nanotechnology Occupational health
Spinazzè, A.; Cattaneo, A.; Borghi, F.; Del Buono, L.; Campagnolo, D.; Rovelli, S.; Cavallo, D.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11383/2074728
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 14
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 13
social impact