Background: Most episodes of venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurred in primary care. To date, no score potentially able to identify those patients who may deserve an antithrombotic prophylaxis has been developed. Aim: The objective of this study is to develop and validate a prediction model for VTE in primary care. Methods: Using the Health Search Database, we identified a cohort of 1,359,880 adult patients between 2002 and 2013. The date of the first General Practitioner's (GP) visit was the cohort entry date. All VTE cases (index date) observed up to December 2014 were identified. The cohort was randomly divided in a development and a validation cohort. According to nested case-cohort analysis, up to five controls were matched to their respective cases on month and year of cohort entry and duration of follow-up. The score was evaluated according to explained variance (pseudo R 2) as a performance measure, ratio of predicted to observed cases as model calibration and area under the curve (AUC) as discrimination measure. Results: The score was able to explain 27.9% of the variation for VTE occurrence. The calibration measure revealed a margin of error lower than 10% in 70% of the population. In terms of discrimination, AUC was 0.82 (95% confidence interval: 0.82-0.83). Results of sensitivity analyses substantially confirmed these findings. Conclusion: The present score demonstrated a very good accuracy in predicting the risk of VTE in primary care. This score may be therefore implemented in clinical practice so aiding GPs in making decision on patients potentially at risk of VTE.
Derivation and Validation of a Prediction Model for Venous Thromboembolism in Primary Care
Dentali F.
;Campanini M.
;
2020-01-01
Abstract
Background: Most episodes of venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurred in primary care. To date, no score potentially able to identify those patients who may deserve an antithrombotic prophylaxis has been developed. Aim: The objective of this study is to develop and validate a prediction model for VTE in primary care. Methods: Using the Health Search Database, we identified a cohort of 1,359,880 adult patients between 2002 and 2013. The date of the first General Practitioner's (GP) visit was the cohort entry date. All VTE cases (index date) observed up to December 2014 were identified. The cohort was randomly divided in a development and a validation cohort. According to nested case-cohort analysis, up to five controls were matched to their respective cases on month and year of cohort entry and duration of follow-up. The score was evaluated according to explained variance (pseudo R 2) as a performance measure, ratio of predicted to observed cases as model calibration and area under the curve (AUC) as discrimination measure. Results: The score was able to explain 27.9% of the variation for VTE occurrence. The calibration measure revealed a margin of error lower than 10% in 70% of the population. In terms of discrimination, AUC was 0.82 (95% confidence interval: 0.82-0.83). Results of sensitivity analyses substantially confirmed these findings. Conclusion: The present score demonstrated a very good accuracy in predicting the risk of VTE in primary care. This score may be therefore implemented in clinical practice so aiding GPs in making decision on patients potentially at risk of VTE.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.